Ravi Shankar Prasad to head LS panel on privileges


Committee of Privileges — Ravi Shankar Prasad Appointment as Chair

UPSC Prelims + Mains Study Note


1. At a Glance


2. Why in the News


3. Background & Evolution


4. Core Static Facts

Parameter Detail
Committee name Committee of Privileges
House Lok Sabha (separate one in Rajya Sabha)
Strength 15 members (Lok Sabha); 10 members (Rajya Sabha)
Constituted by Speaker (Lok Sabha); Chairman (Rajya Sabha)
Current Chair Ravi Shankar Prasad (BJP), nominated March 2026
Constitutional basis Article 105 (Parliament); Article 194 (State Legislatures)
Type of committee Standing Committee (not ad hoc)
Nature Quasi-judicial
Governing law No standalone Act; governed by British parliamentary conventions
Referral mechanism Cases referred by the Speaker (or Chairman in RS)
Punishments it can recommend Admonition, reprimand, suspension, imprisonment
Report submitted to The full House

Key privileges enjoyed by MPs: - Freedom of speech within Parliament (Art. 105(1)) - Immunity from court proceedings for anything said or voted in Parliament (Art. 105(2)) - Freedom from arrest during session (civil cases) - Exemption from jury/witness duty during session

What constitutes breach of privilege: - Publishing expunged remarks - Casting reflections on MPs/Parliament in media - Obstructing MPs in discharge of duties - Bribery of MPs (Cash-for-Vote) - Misrepresenting Parliamentary proceedings [S2]


5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Legal / Constitutional

Ethical / Governance

Administrative

Historical

Political / Representational


6. Recent Developments (last 12–18 months)


7. Prelims Hooks

  1. The Committee of Privileges of Lok Sabha has 15 members, all nominated by the Speaker. [S1]
  2. The Rajya Sabha Committee of Privileges has 10 members, nominated by the Chairman. [S1]
  3. Parliamentary privileges for Parliament are provided under Article 105; for State Legislatures under Article 194 of the Constitution. [S2]
  4. No standalone Parliamentary Privileges Act exists in India; the House is governed by British conventions as they stood at Constitution commencement. [S2]
  5. Article 105(3) mandates Parliament to define privileges by law — this has never been done. [S2]
  6. The Committee of Privileges is a Standing Committee (not an ad hoc/select committee). [S1]
  7. Cases are referred to the Committee by the Speaker; the Committee does not take up matters suo motu. [S1]
  8. The Committee functions as a quasi-judicial body — it can summon members/outsiders and record statements. [S1]
  9. Recommended punishments include admonition, reprimand, suspension from House service, or imprisonment. [S1]
  10. The Ravi Shankar Prasad Committee was constituted on Tuesday, March 3, 2026 (reported March 4, 2026). [S3]
  11. Raja Ram Pal v. Speaker (2007) — Supreme Court held courts can review expulsion of MPs but cannot intervene in internal privilege proceedings.
  12. Publishing expunged remarks from Parliamentary proceedings constitutes a breach of privilege. [S2]
  13. Freedom from arrest in civil cases during session is a key individual privilege of MPs. [S2]
  14. The Cash-for-Query scam (2005) resulted in expulsion of 11 MPs via privilege proceedings — one of the largest such actions in Indian parliamentary history.

8. Mains Relevance

GS Paper: GS-II (Indian Polity & Governance)

Syllabus Heading: Parliament and State Legislatures — Structure, Functioning, Conduct of Business; Powers and Privileges; Issues and Challenges

Plausible Mains Question Stems: 1. "The absence of a codified Parliamentary Privileges Act in India creates more problems than it solves. Critically examine in the context of freedom of the press and democratic accountability." (GS-II, 15 marks) 2. "Examine the composition, functions, and quasi-judicial character of the Lok Sabha Committee of Privileges. How does it balance the need to protect parliamentary dignity with civil liberties of non-members?" (GS-II, 10 marks) 3. "Articles 105 and 194 of the Constitution vest wide privileges in legislators. In light of recent cases, analyse whether parliamentary privilege has become a shield against legitimate public scrutiny." (GS-II, 15 marks)


9. Related Topics to Study Next

Topic Connection
Parliamentary Committees (types & functions) The Privileges Committee is one of ~24 standing committees; understanding the typology is essential.
Article 105 & 194 — Legislative Privileges Direct constitutional source of the Committee's mandate.
Freedom of Speech (Art. 19) vs. Legislative Privilege Core tension adjudicated by SC; appears frequently in Mains.
Anti-Defection Law (Tenth Schedule) Another mechanism regulating MP conduct; often confused with privilege proceedings.
Question Hour & Zero Hour Parliamentary proceedings whose disruption can trigger privilege notices.
Contempt of Court vs. Contempt of Legislature Comparative study of two parallel quasi-judicial oversight mechanisms.
Raja Ram Pal Case (2007) & Searchlight Case (1958) Leading SC judgments on the scope of parliamentary privilege.

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

  1. Confusing Committee strength: Lok Sabha = 15 members; Rajya Sabha = 10 members — not the same.
  2. Assuming a Privileges Act exists: No codified law — India still runs on uncodified British conventions. Aspirants frequently assume the opposite.
  3. Conflating Article 105 with Article 19: Art. 105 gives MPs freedom of speech inside Parliament; Art. 19 gives citizens freedom of speech outside. They operate in different domains and can conflict.
  4. Treating the Committee as ad hoc: It is a Standing Committee, not constituted issue-by-issue.
  5. Assuming courts cannot intervene at all: Post Raja Ram Pal (2007), courts can review expulsion of MPs — the bar is high but not absolute. Saying "courts have no jurisdiction whatsoever" is incorrect.

11. Sources