PAC pulls up govt. for slow implementation of SANKALP scheme
UPSC Study Note: PAC Pulls Up Govt. for Slow Implementation of SANKALP Scheme
1. At a Glance
- SANKALP = Skill Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion — a flagship scheme of the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE), co-financed by the World Bank. [S1]
- Focuses on three pillars: institutional strengthening, quality assurance of skill training, and inclusion of marginalised communities. [S1]
- Critical for UPSC because it sits at the intersection of GS-II (government schemes, accountability) and GS-III (inclusive growth, skill development), and tests knowledge of Parliamentary oversight mechanisms (PAC + CAG interplay).
- The February 2026 PAC censure makes it a live Mains/Prelims target for 2026 cycle.
2. Why in the News
- February 21, 2026: The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of Parliament, chaired by senior Congress leader K.C. Venugopal, criticised the government for "lackadaisical" implementation of SANKALP. [S5]
- The PAC was examining a CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General) report that found: only 44% of the budgeted provision for SANKALP was actually disbursed during 2017-18 to 2023-24 (position as of October 2023). [S5]
- Specific concerns raised: absence of a central monitoring mechanism, gaps in due diligence, weak adherence to implementation guidelines, and sluggish pace across all scheme components. [S5]
3. Background & Evolution
| Year | Milestone |
|---|---|
| October 2017 | Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) approved SANKALP alongside STRIVE scheme; total outlay ₹4,455 crore. [S2][S3] |
| December 13, 2017 | India signed Loan Agreement with World Bank (IBRD) for US$ 250 million (first tranche). [S4] |
| January 19, 2018 | Loan Agreement came into effect; scheme launched. [S4] |
| 2018–2023 | Original implementation window; extended beyond March 2023. [S4][S5] |
| By ~2022 | World Bank disbursed US$ 166.52 million against targets for FY 2017-18 to FY 2019-20. [S4] |
| February 2026 | PAC censure following CAG audit findings on financial and physical shortfalls. [S5] |
Predecessors / Related Initiatives: - Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana (PMKVY) — parallel short-term skill training scheme under MSDE. - STRIVE (Skills Strengthening for Industrial Value Enhancement) — approved alongside SANKALP in October 2017 for ITI strengthening. [S2] - Skill India Mission (2015) — the overarching umbrella under which SANKALP operates. [S1]
4. Core Static Facts
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Full Name | Skill Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion |
| Abbreviation | SANKALP |
| Implementing Ministry | Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship (MSDE) |
| Approved by | Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) |
| Approval Date | October 2017 |
| Launch Year | 2018 |
| Total Outlay | ₹4,455 crore [S5] |
| World Bank (IBRD) Loan | ₹3,300 crore (US$ 500 million in two tranches of US$ 250 million each) [S4][S5] |
| State Leverage Component | ₹660 crore [S5] |
| Industry Leverage Component | ₹495 crore [S5] |
| World Bank Disbursal (by ~2022) | US$ 166.52 million [S4] |
| CAG Finding | Only 44% of budgeted provision disbursed (2017-18 to 2023-24) [S5] |
| Three Result Areas | (1) Institutional strengthening at central/state/district level; (2) Quality assurance of skill programmes; (3) Inclusion of marginalised populations [S1] |
| Focus | Short-term skill training; industry linkages; district-level skilling ecosystem [S1][S2] |
| Parallel Scheme | STRIVE (for ITI strengthening) — approved same date [S2] |
5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis
Economic
- SANKALP targets short-term skilling for livelihood generation, directly impacting employability of unskilled/semi-skilled workforce. [S1]
- Under-utilisation of 56% of budgeted funds represents a significant fiscal drag — World Bank loan costs accrue regardless of absorption. [S5]
- Industry leverage component (₹495 crore) was designed to foster PPP (public-private partnership) in skill delivery; its under-realisation weakens the PPP model. [S5]
Social
- Explicitly designed for marginalised communities — SC, ST, women, minorities, differently-abled persons. [S1]
- Slow implementation directly delays social mobility outcomes for vulnerable beneficiaries.
- Strengthening of district-level skilling ecosystems was intended to bridge rural-urban skilling divide. [S2]
Administrative / Governance
- PAC noted absence of a central monitoring mechanism — a structural gap in scheme design/execution. [S5]
- CAG flagged weak adherence to implementation guidelines and gaps in due diligence at implementing agencies. [S5]
- Three-tier financing (Centre + State + Industry) creates coordination complexity, increasing risk of inter-agency buck-passing.
- The scheme's extended timeline (beyond original March 2023 deadline) indicates systemic implementation failure. [S5]
Legal / Constitutional
- PAC operates under Articles 148–151 of the Constitution (CAG mandate) and Parliamentary Rules; it examines CAG reports post-facto.
- CAG audit of SANKALP is under provisions of the CAG (Duties, Powers and Conditions of Service) Act, 1971.
- PAC's findings are tabled in Parliament; government is required to submit Action Taken Reports (ATRs).
Ethical / Accountability
- "Lackadaisical" tag by PAC signals failure of programme ownership within MSDE bureaucracy. [S5]
- Absence of monitoring mechanism raises questions about transparency in World Bank-funded projects, which carry strict disbursement-linked indicators (DLIs).
- Disbursal gaps expose risk of unutilised loan liability — India pays commitment charges on undisbursed tranches.
6. Recent Developments (Last 12–18 Months)
- February 21, 2026: PAC (chaired by K.C. Venugopal) formally criticises Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship for slow implementation; describes the approach as "lackadaisical." [S5]
- October 2023 (CAG position date): CAG audit finds only 44% disbursement of SANKALP funds over six years; flags sluggish physical and financial progress. [S5]
- Ongoing post-2023: Scheme remains active beyond original March 2023 deadline; no publicly confirmed new end-date or revised outlay found in Tier 1 searches.
7. Prelims Hooks
- SANKALP stands for Skill Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion. [S1]
- SANKALP is a scheme under the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, not Ministry of Labour. [S1]
- Approved by Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) in October 2017. [S2]
- Total project outlay: ₹4,455 crore. [S5]
- World Bank (IBRD) contribution: ₹3,300 crore (largest single component — ~74% of total). [S5]
- Loan agreement signed on December 13, 2017; effective January 19, 2018. [S4]
- World Bank assistance structured in two tranches of US$ 250 million each (total US$ 500 million). [S4]
- SANKALP was approved alongside STRIVE (Skills Strengthening for Industrial Value Enhancement) in the same CCEA meeting. [S2]
- CAG found only 44% of budgeted provision disbursed between 2017-18 and 2023-24. [S5]
- The Public Accounts Committee (PAC) — not PAC-equivalent body — examined the CAG report on SANKALP. [S5]
- PAC chairman at the time of censure: K.C. Venugopal (Congress). [S5]
- SANKALP has three Result Areas: institutional strengthening, quality assurance, inclusion of marginalised communities. [S1]
- State leverage component of SANKALP: ₹660 crore; Industry leverage: ₹495 crore. [S5]
- Implementing unit focus: district-level skilling ecosystem — a distinguishing feature from central-level schemes. [S2]
8. Mains Relevance
GS Paper Mapping: | Paper | Syllabus Heading | |-------|-----------------| | GS-II | Government Policies and Interventions; Parliament and Executive Accountability; Role of CAG/PAC | | GS-III | Inclusive Growth; Human Resource Development; Skill Development |
Plausible Mains Question Stems: 1. "The Public Accounts Committee's censure of SANKALP implementation reveals structural weaknesses in India's skill development governance. Critically analyse." (GS-II, 15 marks) 2. "Examine the role of World Bank-assisted projects in India's skilling ecosystem, with reference to SANKALP. What challenges arise from externally-funded flagship schemes?" (GS-III, 15 marks) 3. "Discuss how the interplay between CAG audits and the Public Accounts Committee strengthens legislative oversight of executive action, using a recent example." (GS-II, 10 marks)
9. Related Topics to Study Next
| Topic | Connection |
|---|---|
| PMKVY (Pradhan Mantri Kaushal Vikas Yojana) | Sister short-term skilling scheme under same ministry; compare targets, funding, outcomes |
| STRIVE Scheme | Approved alongside SANKALP in October 2017; focuses on ITI ecosystem — often confused with SANKALP |
| Skill India Mission (2015) | Overarching umbrella framework under which both SANKALP and STRIVE operate |
| Public Accounts Committee (PAC) | Constitutional/procedural basis of PAC, its composition, powers, and distinction from Estimates Committee |
| CAG of India — Role & Functions | Articles 148–151; CAG Act 1971; types of audits (performance, compliance, financial) |
| World Bank IBRD Lending to India | Mechanism of DLIs (Disbursement-Linked Indicators), sector priorities, conditionalities |
| National Skill Development Corporation (NSDC) | Key implementing partner for skilling schemes; PPP model; industry linkages |
| National Policy on Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, 2015 | Policy foundation for all post-2015 skilling initiatives |
10. Common Errors / Trap Areas
- Wrong Ministry: SANKALP is under Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship — NOT Ministry of Labour & Employment (which handles EPFO, ESI, labour codes). This is a frequent MCQ trap.
- Confusing SANKALP with STRIVE: Both approved October 2017, both under MSDE, both World Bank-assisted — but STRIVE targets ITI ecosystem (long-term vocational training infrastructure) while SANKALP targets short-term skill training and district-level ecosystems.
- World Bank Loan Quantum: The commonly quoted figures are US$ 250 million (first tranche), US$ 500 million (total IBRD loan), and US$ 675 million (total project cost including government contribution). Mixing these up is a classic error.
- PAC vs. Estimates Committee: PAC examines past expenditure (post-facto, based on CAG reports); Estimates Committee examines future estimates. SANKALP was reviewed by PAC — not the Estimates Committee.
- CCEA vs. Cabinet: SANKALP was approved by the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA), a specific sub-committee — not the full Union Cabinet. Exam options often offer both.
11. Sources
- [S1] Sankalp Scheme — PIB Press Release — https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1780914 — (Tier 1)
- [S2] Cabinet approves SANKALP & STRIVE Schemes to boost Skill India Mission — PIB Press Release — https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1506070 — (Tier 1)
- [S3] Skill India's SANKALP Scheme to focus on district level skilling ecosystem — PIB Press Release — https://www.pib.gov.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=192464 — (Tier 1)
- [S4] India Signs Loan Agreement with World Bank for US$ 250 Million for SANKALP Project — PIB Press Release — https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1513206 — (Tier 1)
- [S5] PAC pulls up govt. for slow implementation of SANKALP scheme — The Hindu, February 21, 2026 — https://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/2026-02-21/th_international/articleGBFFK9PS5-13597102.ece — (Tier 4 / Article supplied by user)