A ‘Third Way’ for AI governance


A 'Third Way' for AI Governance — UPSC Study Note


1. At a Glance


2. Why in the News


3. Background & Evolution


4. Core Static Facts

Parameter Detail
Framework name India AI Governance Guidelines
Released by Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MeitY)
Date of release November 2025
Nature Non-binding, principle-based governance framework (not legislation)
Guiding motto "Safe and Trusted AI for All"
Core guiding principles Seven: Trust; People First; Innovation over Restraint; Fairness; Accountability; Understandable by Design; Safety, Resilience & Sustainability
Governance pillars Six pillars (industry, developers, regulators, etc.) with mapped action plan
Parent mission India AI Mission (approved March 2024, ₹10,371.92 crore, 5 years)
Implementing body MeitY; operationalised via IndiaAI portal
Summit context AI Impact Summit, New Delhi, February 19, 2026
Key diplomatic architect cited Amlan Mohanty (framework architect, Strategy Lead at AI Safety Connect)
Comparative models rejected EU AI Act (compliance-heavy); US (deregulatory/market-led); China (centralised state model)
Target beneficiaries Inclusive development focus: health, education, agriculture sectors
Multilateral fora engaged G20, UN, OECD, Global Partnership on AI (GPAI)

5. Multi-Dimensional Analysis

Geopolitical / Strategic

Economic

Legal / Constitutional

Ethical / Governance

Scientific / Technological

Administrative


6. Recent Developments (Last 12–18 Months)


7. Prelims Hooks

  1. India's AI Governance Guidelines were released in November 2025 by MeitY. [S2]
  2. The guidelines are non-binding (principle-based), not a statutory act. [S2]
  3. India's AI governance motto: "Safe and Trusted AI for All". [S4]
  4. The framework rests on seven guiding principles and six governance pillars. [S2]
  5. The India AI Mission was approved by the Union Cabinet in March 2024 with an outlay of ₹10,371.92 crore over five years. [S3]
  6. The "Third Way" contrasts with three existing models: EU (compliance-heavy), US (hands-off/market-led), and China (centralised state). [S1]
  7. The AI Impact Summit 2026 was hosted by India in New Delhi in February 2026. [S1]
  8. India's framework is administered via the IndiaAI portal under MeitY. [S3]
  9. The framework's guiding philosophical principle is "Do No Harm", operationalised through innovation sandboxes. [S2]
  10. India participated in the AI Action Summit in Paris in February 2025 before hosting its own in Delhi in 2026. [S4]
  11. The framework explicitly targets inclusive AI adoption in health, education, and agriculture. [S4]
  12. The concept of an AI Safety Commons for the Global South — shared datasets, benchmarks, governance resources — emerged from India-led deliberations at IIT Madras/India AI Mission conclave. [S3]
  13. Amlan Mohanty is cited as one of the principal architects of the India AI Governance Guidelines framework. [S1]

8. Mains Relevance

GS Papers: Primarily GS-II (governance, India's foreign policy, multilateral institutions) and GS-III (S&T — developments in AI and their applications; indigenisation of technology).

Specific syllabus headings: - GS-II: Government policies and interventions for development; India and the changing global order; Bilateral, regional and global groupings affecting India's interests. - GS-III: Awareness in the fields of IT, space, computers, robotics, nano-technology, bio-technology; Challenges and achievements of India in science and technology.

Plausible Mains Questions:

  1. "India's AI Governance Guidelines (2025) represent a 'Third Way' between regulatory excess and regulatory vacuum." Critically examine this claim and assess India's capacity to lead AI governance for the Global South. (GS-III / GS-II, 15 marks)

  2. "Effective AI governance requires contextual adaptation, not copy-paste regulation." In light of India's non-binding, principle-based AI framework, discuss the trade-offs between regulatory flexibility and enforcement certainty. (GS-III, 10 marks)

  3. Discuss how India's AI governance diplomacy complements its strategic interests in the Indo-Pacific and multilateral forums such as the G20 and OECD. (GS-II, 15 marks)


9. Related Topics to Study Next

Topic Connection
EU AI Act, 2024 The "compliance-heavy" pole that India's Third Way explicitly distances itself from; compare risk classification systems
India AI Mission (2024) The financial and infrastructure backbone of India's AI governance ambitions
Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 India's statutory data privacy framework — the closest legislative cousin to AI regulation
Global Partnership on AI (GPAI) India is a founding member; key multilateral forum for AI governance norms
G20 New Delhi Leaders' Declaration (2023) Introduced responsible AI language at the multilateral level under India's presidency
OECD AI Principles Tier-2 benchmark used globally; India's framework aligns with but adapts these principles
AI Safety Summits (Bletchley 2023, Seoul 2024, Paris 2025) Chronological sequence of global AI governance events leading to Delhi 2026
Digital Public Infrastructure (DPI) India's DPI model (UPI, Aadhaar, ONDC) is the analogue India proposes for AI diffusion in the Global South

10. Common Errors / Trap Areas

  1. Confusing the Guidelines with legislation: The India AI Governance Guidelines (November 2025) are non-binding policy directives, not a statute. Do not confuse them with the EU AI Act (which is binding law with fines). India has no AI-specific Act as of mid-2026.

  2. Wrong ministry attribution: AI governance guidelines are under MeitY, not NITI Aayog (which handles strategic policy) or the Ministry of Science & Technology. The India AI Mission is also operationalised through MeitY/IndiaAI.

  3. Conflating AI Impact Summit (Delhi, 2026) with AI Action Summit (Paris, 2025): These are separate events. India participated in Paris (February 2025); India hosted in New Delhi (February 2026).

  4. Misstating the number of principles: The framework has seven guiding principles and six governance pillars — these are distinct counts; do not merge them.

  5. Assuming the "Third Way" is a formal treaty or international agreement: It is a governance positioning concept advanced by India diplomatically, not a binding multilateral instrument. The AI Safety Commons for the Global South is aspirational infrastructure, not yet institutionalised.


11. Sources