UPSC Prelims Practice Questions — T.N. raises concerns over Centre’s norms on projects in Cauvery basin

Q1. In the context of the Union Ministry of Jal Shakti / CWC guidelines (2025) for appraising water resources projects in the Cauvery basin, what does the 'presumptive concurrence' clause objected to by Tamil Nadu mean?

  • A. If the Cauvery Water Management Authority does not convey its views within six months, the Central Water Commission's stand is deemed to have been accepted by default
  • B. If a party State fails to file objections within six months, it is presumed to have consented to the project's clearance
  • C. If the Supreme Court does not stay a project within six months, the tribunal's allocation is presumed to stand modified
  • D. If the Central Water Commission does not appraise a DPR within six months, the project is presumed approved by the concerned State

Q2. Under the Inter-State River Water Disputes Act, 1956, in which year was the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal (CWDT) constituted?

  • A. 1990
  • B. 2007
  • C. 2013
  • D. 2018

Q3. Under the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal's Final Award (as modified by the Supreme Court), which State/UT received the single largest allocation of the river's dependable annual flow?

  • A. Tamil Nadu
  • B. Karnataka
  • C. Kerala
  • D. Puducherry

Q4. The 2025 guidelines for appraisal of water resources projects in the Cauvery basin, which Tamil Nadu has termed 'unilateral', were framed by which central body under the Ministry of Jal Shakti?

  • A. Central Water Commission
  • B. Central Ground Water Board
  • C. National Water Development Agency
  • D. Cauvery Water Regulation Committee