·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomy

The absence of a high-frequency services indicator was a critical gap in India's statistical architecture. Critically examine how the Index of Services Production addresses this gap and what limitations remain.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. How ISP addresses the gap
  2. Limitations that remain
  3. Way forward

Services make up about 52.9% of India's GVA (2024-25) [1]. Industry has long been tracked monthly by the IIP, but services had no short-term output measure. NSO-MoSPI's Index of Services Production (ISP) has been released on a trial basis since July 2026, with base year 2024-25. It is a significant but still partial fix.

How ISP addresses the gap

  • Frequency and timeliness: It is released monthly with a ~60-day lag, on the 29th of each month [1]. It complements the IIP for tracking business cycles [2].
  • Data innovation: GST data is used for statistical purposes for the first time. Administrative data covers air, rail, banking and insurance. ASISSE will later add health and education [2].
  • Global alignment: It follows the OECD Compilation Manual for ISP (2007) [1].
  • Sub-sector detail: The July 2026 release showed administrative and support services up 20.9% and air transport down 8.4% [4]. Aggregate GVA figures cannot show this kind of detail.

Limitations that remain

  • Partial coverage: It covers 19 sub-sectors, ~60% of services [1], and only the formal sector [2]. Firms below the ₹20 lakh GST threshold are left out. Excluded segments make up nearly 33% of services GVA [3].
  • Weak deflators: Only five sub-sectors have SPPIs [2]. Most others are deflated with CPI, which includes GST, so a change in GST rates can distort real growth [3].
  • Formalisation bias: The "universe approach" counts all GST filers. When an existing business newly registers, it can look like new output [3].
  • Interim weights and volatility: Weights within sub-sectors are turnover-based until ASISSE results arrive. Some GST categories are highly volatile, and trial figures may be revised [3].

Way forward

  • DPIIT: Produce monthly SPPIs for major services [3].
  • Line ministries: Set up monthly reporting systems [3].
  • Informal sector: Adapt the IIP committee's method for unincorporated units [3].

Overall, ISP turns a blind spot into a monthly signal, though only for the formal part of services. The TAC rightly judged a trial ISP "more appropriate than continuing without" one [3]. Better deflators, weights and informal-sector coverage can make it a robust basis for evidence-based policy, in line with SDG target 17.18 on timely, reliable data.

Sources

  1. 1Index of Services Production: Measuring the Pulse of India's Services Economy, PIB Backgrounder (14 Jul 2026)services share of GVA, 60-day lag, OECD manual, 19 sub-sectors / ~60% coverage
  2. 2FAQs on Index of Services Production, MoSPIGST used for statistics for the first time, three data sources, complement to IIP, formal-sector coverage, limited SPPIs
  3. 3Report of the Technical Advisory Committee on Index of Services Production, NSO-MoSPI (July 2026)GST threshold exclusion, ~33% GVA excluded, CPI-GST distortion, universe approach, interim weights, recommendations
  4. 4Release of Sub-Sectoral Trial ISP for July 2026 (Base Year 2024-25), PIB (29 Sep 2026)July 2026 sub-sector growth figures
Practice
8 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy