·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomyCulture

Agriculture's share in GDP has declined sharply, yet it remains the largest employer. Examine the reasons for this paradox and suggest measures to enhance farm viability.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Reasons for the paradox
  2. Measures to enhance farm viability

At Independence, agriculture was India's dominant sector. Today agriculture and allied activities contribute nearly one-fifth of GVA but still employ about 46.1% of the workforce [1]. Output has moved to other sectors while jobs have not. The result is low output per worker and disguised unemployment.

Reasons for the paradox

  • Services-led growth: Growth came mainly from skill- and capital-intensive services. These absorbed few rural workers, so labour could not follow output out of farming [1].
  • Tiny, fragmented holdings: About 86% of farmers are small or marginal, and the average holding is under 1.1 ha [2]. Such plots cannot achieve economies of scale or mechanise.
  • Rainfed dependence: A large share of net sown area is rainfed [3]. This keeps yields low and volatile, and climate stress makes the risk worse.
  • Skewed price support: Three states produce 49% of wheat but account for 93% of its procurement [4]. At the same paddy MSP, Punjab farmers earned about 149% over cost while Maharashtra farmers made a 17% loss [4]. Farmers elsewhere effectively sell below MSP.
  • Weak exit routes: Limited skills, informal credit and a shortage of rural non-farm jobs keep surplus labour on the land.

Measures to enhance farm viability

  • Collectivise: The scheme to form 10,000 FPOs lets small farmers pool inputs, get credit and sell together [2].
  • Secure water: Expand micro-irrigation and groundwater recharge, as in the NCF's "Million Wells Recharge" proposal [5]. Adopt the climate-resilient practices promoted under NMSA [3].
  • Reform procurement: Take procurement to under-served states, as the Shanta Kumar Committee reviewed [6]. Publish MSP margins state-wise and against C2 (full cost of production) [4].
  • Credit and risk cover: Adopt the NCF's proposals for cheaper crop loans and an Agriculture Risk Fund [5].
  • Diversify: Move towards horticulture, dairy and fisheries, and build agro-processing to create rural non-farm jobs.

Agriculture's share of output has fallen, but its share of jobs has not, because too little other employment has been created and farm productivity remains low. A two-track approach is needed. Productivity reforms should make farming viable, and rural industrialisation should give surplus labour a way out. The Swaminathan Commission's goal of income security for farmers [5] should guide both tracks and would support SDG 2 and SDG 8.

Sources

  1. 1PIB – India's agriculture sector demonstrates resilience: Economic Survey 2024-2546.1% of workforce; about one-fifth of GVA
  2. 2PIB – Central Sector Scheme "Formation and Promotion of 10,000 new FPOs"about 86% of farmers small or marginal; average holding under 1.1 ha; FPO scheme
  3. 3PIB – National Mission for Sustainable Agriculturerainfed share of net sown area; climate-resilient farming
  4. 4PRS Legislative Research – Explained: Recent changes in MSPsprocurement concentration; Punjab vs Maharashtra margins; C2 base
  5. 5PRS Legislative Research – Swaminathan Report: National Commission on FarmersMillion Wells Recharge, cheaper crop loans, Agriculture Risk Fund, farmer income focus
  6. 6PIB – Recommendations of High Level Committee on restructuring of FCIShanta Kumar Committee on procurement
Practice
8 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity