·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsGeographyPolityIR

Analyse the economic and social costs of prolonged drought, with reference to comparative international experience.

In this answer
  1. Economic costs
  2. Social costs

Prolonged drought is not merely a rainfall deficit but a slow-onset disaster whose costs compound across production, livelihoods and public services. Britain's 1976 drought — its worst in centuries, answered by an emergency Drought Act 1976 [1] — and its recurrence in 2026 show that even temperate, water-rich nations bear heavy economic and social costs.

Economic costs

  • Agricultural collapse: the 1976 UK drought caused roughly £1 billion in damage at then-prices, with industrial output flagged as at risk had rains failed through autumn [2].
  • Input and infrastructure stress: in 2026, England's reservoir storage fell well below the long-term average and over 1,500 abstraction restrictions were imposed, raising irrigation and livestock-watering costs and depressing crop yields and grass growth [3].
  • Emergency expenditure: Britain in 1976 studied importing drinking water by ship from Scandinavia — an extreme illustration of the fiscal premium paid for supply-side failure [2].
  • Recurrence multiplies loss: three droughts in five years (2022, 2025, 2026) prevent recovery between shocks [3].

Social costs

  • Loss of assured water access: night-time cut-offs and planned standpipe queues in 1976 turned water from a tap service into a rationed commodity [2].
  • Inequity of burden: rationing falls hardest on households without storage, echoing India's drought-hit regions where women bear the drudgery of distance-fetching.
  • Behavioural and health impacts: per-capita use fell from about 190 to 95 litres/day during 1976 — relief bought by austerity, not resilience [2].
  • Governance strain: coordinating ten regional water authorities plus separate Crown Dependency regimes exposed administrative fragmentation [2].

Lessons Drought's costs are therefore convertible — economic loss becomes social deprivation when institutions respond late. The comparative lesson is that legal preparedness (UK's Drought Orders; India's Disaster Management Act, 2005) must be paired with demand management and supply security through Jal Jeevan Mission and watershed recharge [4]. Anticipatory, equity-sensitive water governance — not emergency rationing — is the durable answer to a drying climate.

Sources

  1. 1Drought Act 1976 (UK)emergency drought-order powers enacted after the 1976 crisis
  2. 2Fiftieth anniversary conference marking the 1976 drought — Environment Agency, GOV.UK£1 bn agricultural damage, standpipes and cut-offs, 190→95 litres/day, water-import study, multi-authority coordination
  3. 3Dry weather and drought in England 2026: summary reports — GOV.UKreservoir storage below long-term average, 1,500+ abstraction restrictions, yield and forage losses, repeat droughts
  4. 4Jal Jeevan Mission, Ministry of Jal ShaktiIndia's assured rural drinking-water supply programme
Practice
11 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Geography