·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsS&T

Analyse the shift from 'ecosystem creation' to 'ecosystem deepening' in India's industrial policy approach, with reference to the semiconductor sector.

In this answer
  1. Phase I — Ecosystem creation (2021–2025)
  2. Phase II — Ecosystem deepening
  3. Why the shift matters analytically

NITI Aayog's Frontier Tech Hub roadmap, Future of India's Semiconductor Industry (May 2026), signals a deliberate policy pivot — from attracting fabrication capacity to building indigenous capability across the chip value chain [1].

Phase I — Ecosystem creation (2021–2025)

  • The India Semiconductor Mission (ISM), launched under MeitY in 2021 with a ₹76,000 crore outlay, offered capital subsidies for fabs, OSAT units and design firms [4].
  • The logic was investment attraction: de-risk entry costs, seed foundational plants, and secure anchor investors.
  • Its limit was structural — India remained an assembly-heavy, import-dependent electronics economy, with the roadmap conceding that the local ecosystem cannot yet meet domestic demand [1].

Phase II — Ecosystem deepening

  • ISM 2.0, announced in Union Budget 2026, marks a move from creation to consolidation and global integration, deepening support for design, manufacturing and advanced skills [3].
  • Targets a USD 120–150 billion value chain by 2035, with 10–13% global market share and 15–25% self-sufficiency by 2030 [1].
  • Prioritises frontier niches — advanced packaging, compound semiconductors, wide-bandgap materials and AI-native chip design — over the leading-node wafer race [2].
  • Rests on talent depth: India supplies nearly a fifth of the global chip-design workforce, with a goal of 100+ breakthrough design IPs by 2035 [1].

Why the shift matters analytically

  • Comparative advantage: subsidies buy plants, not capability; deepening targets IP, materials and R&D where value is captured.
  • Strategic autonomy: partnerships with the US, Japan and Europe hedge against supply-chain weaponisation [2].
  • Governance: joint launch by the Finance Ministry, MeitY and NITI Aayog reflects inter-ministerial ownership rather than a single-scheme approach [1].

Constraints persist — critical-mineral dependence, capital intensity and long gestation. Yet the pivot is sound: India is sequencing industrial policy from capacity to capability, aligning the chip mission with the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision of technological self-reliance.

Sources

  1. 1NITI Aayog releases "Future of India's Semiconductor Industry" Roadmap — PIB2035 value-chain target, market-share and self-sufficiency goals, design-workforce and IP targets, ecosystem-readiness gap, launch by FM and MeitY with NITI Aayog
  2. 2Future of India's Semiconductor Industry — NITI Aayogpriority frontier segments and international partnerships
  3. 3India Semiconductor Mission 2.0 — PIBshift from ecosystem creation to consolidation and global integration
  4. 4India Semiconductor Mission — Government of India2021 launch under MeitY, ₹76,000 crore outlay, fab/OSAT/design incentives
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on S&T