"Base-year revisions are essential but not sufficient for credible macroeconomic statistics." Examine this with reference to the 2022-23 IIP series.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →The Index of Industrial Production (IIP), compiled by NSO-MoSPI, moved to a 2022-23 base on 1 June 2026. This is its 10th revision since the first IIP of 1937 [2][3]. The August 2026 print shows 8.0% growth [1]. The new series is clearly better, but whether the index is credible depends on more than a new base year.
Why base revision is essential
- Updated basket: 463 item groups. 120 were added (stents, vaccines, CCTV cameras) and 64 dropped (kerosene, CFLs) [2].
- Wider coverage: two new sectors, gas supply and water, sewerage & waste management. Sewerage data comes from AMRUT cities [2].
- Consistency: weights come from 2022-23 NAS GVA and ASI. The base now matches GDP and WPI, and industries are classified under NIC-2025 [2].
- Timeliness: the release was brought forward by two weeks. The MPC now gets IIP data with a one-month lag instead of two [6].
Why it is not sufficient
- Large revisions: the August Quick Estimate is based on only 88% weighted response. July was revised from 6.7% to 7.4% [1], so first prints need caution.
- No seasonally adjusted series: the monsoon and festivals shift output between months, so comparing one month with the next is unreliable [2][6].
- Fixed-weight drift: Laspeyres weights stay frozen until the next revision. The TAC notes that "creative destruction" of firms and products biases output downward. Chain-linking is backed by the OECD and UN IRIIP 2010, but India runs it only as an internal pilot [2][6].
- Informal-sector blind spot: the IIP mainly captures the organised sector [6]. So weak consumer non-durables growth (2.1%) [1] cannot on its own show whether mass demand is weak.
- Weak proxies: water and sewerage are measured by connections, not by service delivered. Items reported by value are deflated by WPI rather than an Output PPI [6].
Way forward
- Publish seasonally adjusted and chain-linked indices alongside the fixed-base index [6].
- Build a GST-based business register that tracks factories opening and closing [6].
- Create an ASUSE-based unincorporated-sector indicator and move to an Output PPI deflator once it is stable [6].
The 2022-23 rebasing updates what the IIP measures. Continuous upgrades to method will decide how well it measures. Acting on the TAC's recommendations would make the IIP a timely, reliable and consistent guide for evidence-based policy and a stronger national statistical system.
Sources
- 1PIB — Quick Estimates of IIP and Use-Based Index for August 2026 (Base 2022-23=100), 28 Sep 20268.0% growth, 88% response rate, July revision from 6.7% to 7.4%, consumer non-durables at 2.1%
- 2MoSPI — FAQs, Index of Industrial Production: New Series with Base Year 2022-2310th revision, basket changes, new sectors, weights, no seasonally adjusted series, chain-linking kept as a pilot
- 3PIB — First Press Release of All India IIP of New Series with Base Year 2022-23new series launched 1 June 2026
- 4NSO, MoSPI — Report of the Technical Advisory Committee on the New Series of All India IIP 2022-23MPC lag, creative-destruction bias, OECD/IRIIP 2010 chain-linking, organised-sector coverage, connection-based proxies, GST register, ASUSE index, Output PPI
Practice
7 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.