·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEnvironmentS&T

Biofortification is emerging as a key strategy to combat hidden hunger in India. Examine its scientific basis and implementation challenges.

In this answer
  1. Scientific basis
  2. Implementation challenges

"Hidden hunger" is micronutrient deficiency — of iron, zinc or vitamin A — persisting even where calorie intake is adequate. Biofortification, the breeding of higher nutrient density into staple crops, addresses it at source; ICAR released 29 biofortified varieties among 386 improved varieties in the past year [1], signalling its mainstreaming.

Scientific basis

  • Conventional breeding: high-nutrient germplasm is crossed into high-yielding backgrounds, fixing iron, zinc, protein and vitamin A enrichment genetically in the seed [1].
  • Agronomic route: micronutrient-enriched fertilizers raise grain concentration where soils are deficient.
  • Molecular/transgenic route: used where natural genetic variation for a nutrient is absent in the crop.
  • Delivery logic: the nutrient travels inside the staple already consumed daily, requiring no dietary behaviour change — unlike supplementation or fortification, which need continuous supply chains.
  • Convergence with climate goals: ICAR's varietal pipeline is 94% climate-resilient [1], allowing nutrition and stress-tolerance traits to be stacked in a single release.

Implementation challenges

  • Seed multiplication and last-mile reach: technologies reached roughly one crore farmers directly [1] — a fraction of India's farm households; breeder-to-certified seed chains remain thin.
  • Absent price signal: biofortified grain is visually indistinguishable, attracts no MSP premium, and procurement agencies do not segregate it, so farmers see no return.
  • Consumer acceptance: altered colour or taste (orange sweet potato, yellow maize) meets resistance in staple-conservative diets.
  • Nutrient retention: milling, polishing and cooking losses, plus poor bioavailability from phytate-rich diets, dilute on-plate gains.
  • Institutional capacity: research is spread across 113 ICAR institutes and 74 agricultural universities [2], but extension — not laboratory capability — is the weak link.
  • Regulatory delay constrains the transgenic pathway.

Biofortification is scientifically sound and cost-effective, yet its impact rests on delivery rather than discovery. Embedding biofortified staples into PDS, ICDS and PM POSHAN procurement, coupled with seed-village programmes and a targeted price incentive, would convert varietal releases into measurable nutritional outcomes — advancing food and nutritional security under the Viksit Bharat 2047 vision.

Sources

  1. 1Over the Past Year, ICAR Developed 386 Improved Varieties Across 44 Crops, Including 94% Climate-Resilient and 29 Biofortified Varieties, PIB (16 July 2026)29 biofortified varieties, nutrient traits, 94% climate-resilient share, farmer outreach figure
  2. 2About Us, Indian Council of Agricultural ResearchICAR network of 113 institutes and 74 agricultural universities
Practice
12 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity