·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

The breach of the upper tolerance band in October 2026 shows inflation moving from food to services. Examine how effective the Flexible Inflation Targeting framework is in a supply-shock-prone economy.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Where FIT has worked
  2. Limits in a supply-shock-prone economy
  3. Should food be excluded?
  4. Way forward

Headline CPI inflation reached 6.1% in October 2026. This crossed the 6% upper limit of the 4% ±2% band for the first time in two years [1]. Restaurants & accommodation (10.1%) and transport (5.8%) also hit series highs [1]. So this is no longer only a food shock, and it is a real test of whether FIT is built for an economy prone to supply shocks.

Where FIT has worked

  • Statutory anchor: under Sec 45ZA of the RBI Act, the Centre fixes the target in consultation with the RBI every five years. A six-member MPC under Sec 45ZB sets rates [3]. This makes policy rules-based and accountable.
  • Built-in flexibility: the ±2% band lets the MPC look through short-lived food spikes.
  • Credibility endorsed: the RBI's 2025 review drew strong support for headline CPI. The Centre kept 4% ±2% for 2026–31 [4][5].

Limits in a supply-shock-prone economy

  • Rates cannot grow crops: food inflation at 8.5% [1] comes from weather and harvest shocks. A repo hike cuts credit and jobs but does not lower vegetable prices.
  • Second-round effects: inflation rose from 5.54% to 6.1% in one month [2][1] and spread into services. By the time tightening comes, expectations may have already set in.
  • Imported energy shocks: fuel costs feed transport inflation [1], and monetary policy cannot control them.
  • Measurement gap: the new CPI series (base 2024) has sectoral data only from January 2026 [1]. The band was renewed before the new basket had been tested.
  • Weak transparency: a failure report under Sec 45ZN goes to the government. It need not be published, and the 2022 report was not.

Should food be excluded?

  • The Economic Survey 2023-24 suggested targeting inflation without food and using DBT or coupons to help the poor [6].
  • October 2026 data argues against this. Food costs are already spreading into services, so a core-only target would catch the spread late. The RBI's review also noted that most economies still target headline inflation [4].

Way forward

  • MPC: use core inflation as a supporting guide, and tighten only if services inflation persists.
  • Government: manage supply through buffer stocks, OMSS and fuel-tax changes, and protect the poor through DBT.
  • Accountability: publish Sec 45ZN reports.

FIT works well as a credible anchor for expectations, but it cannot handle supply shocks alone. Keeping headline-CPI targeting while adding supply-side coordination and open accountability would make price stability last. That protects real incomes and supports SDG-1 (no poverty) and SDG-2 (zero hunger).

Sources

  1. 1The Hindu, "Retail inflation goes past RBI's limit to 6.1% in Oct." (13 Nov 2026)October 2026 CPI at 6.1%, category highs (food 8.5%, transport 5.8%, restaurants 10.1%), first breach in two years, new base-2024 series with sectoral data from January 2026
  2. 2MoSPI Press Release: CPI for September 2026September 2026 headline CPI at 5.54%
  3. 3RBI: Monetary Policy (framework under the RBI Act, 1934)Sec 45ZA target-setting, Sec 45ZB six-member MPC
  4. 4RBI: Review of Monetary Policy Framework – A Discussion Paper (Aug 2025)headline vs core debate; headline targeting is the international norm
  5. 5RBI Annual Report4% ±2% target retained for 2026–31 by Gazette notification of 25 March 2026; stakeholder support for headline CPI
  6. 6Economic Survey 2023-24, Ministry of Financeproposal to target inflation without food; DBT and coupons for poor households

More from this note