·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Can digital public infrastructure insulate citizens from cash shortages? Discuss with lessons from India, Kenya and Nigeria.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. How DPI cushions a cash shock
  2. Why DPI falls short: lessons
  3. Way forward

Digital public infrastructure (DPI) means shared digital rails such as UPI, Aadhaar-linked accounts and mobile money. It offers a way to pay that does not depend on cash. India's 2016 demonetisation withdrew about 86% of currency by value with four hours' notice [1]. Kenya and Nigeria had similar episodes [1]. These cases show that DPI can cushion cash shocks but cannot fully insulate people from them.

How DPI cushions a cash shock

  • Another way to pay: promoting digital payments was a stated aim of demonetisation [1]. Payments from bank accounts keep trade going when notes run short.
  • Pushes money into formal channels: the World Bank expected demonetisation to shift domestic remittances into formal and digital channels over time [3].

Why DPI falls short: lessons

  • India: the shift was uneven and partly temporary. The RBI found that the move away from cash was transient in nine States/UTs, with no clear change elsewhere [2].
  • India: excluded groups were hit hardest. Informal flows suffered far more than formal ones. Undocumented migrants struggled to exchange their cash wages [3].
  • India: buying essentials. Forthcoming research suggests that people buying medicines for sudden illness were most exposed, because they could not plan ahead or compare prices [1]. The old-note exemption covered only government hospital pharmacies [6].
  • Kenya (2019): even a country known for mobile money faced cash shortages after withdrawing notes [1]. A well-developed digital system did not remove the informal economy's need for cash.
  • Nigeria (2022–23): the transition window was too short. This caused a cash crunch, cut growth in manufacturing and services, and created a black market for new notes [4]. The IMF had warned about the harm to the unbanked [5].

Way forward

  • Assess the unbanked first and allow longer switch-over periods before withdrawing notes [5][4].
  • Exempt essentials for the whole shortage: let all licensed chemists accept old notes, not just government hospital pharmacies [6].
  • Make DPI inclusive: offline and feature-phone payments, plus help from banking correspondents, so the last mile is not left out.

Experience in India, Kenya and Nigeria shows that DPI works as a shock absorber, not a substitute for careful cash management. It can protect citizens only if note withdrawals are phased, essentials are exempted and nobody is left without a way to pay. That approach supports the financial inclusion and health access goals of SDGs 1 and 3, and the constitutional promise of welfare under Article 38.

Sources

  1. 1Demonetisation and the health costs of cash shortages, The Hindu, 7 Nov 2026 (news)86% of currency withdrawn with four hours' notice; digital-payments aim; Kenya and Nigeria parallels; exposure of people buying medicines for sudden illness
  2. 2RBI Bulletin, December 2018: article on currency demand after demonetisationmove away from cash transient in nine States/UTs
  3. 3World Bank Blogs: Demonetization in India, short and long term impact on remittances (2016)informal flows hit hardest; undocumented migrants; expected shift to formal and digital channels
  4. 4World Bank, Nigeria Development Update: Seizing the Opportunity (June 2023)transition window too short; cash crunch; black market for new notes
  5. 5IMF Country Report No. 23/93: Nigeria, 2022 Article IV Consultationwarning about harm to the unbanked and to system-wide liquidity
  6. 6PIB (8 Nov 2016): Government cancels legal tender character of Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notesold-note exemption limited to government hospitals and their pharmacies

More from this note