·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolity

"Capacity-building of elected representatives is the missing link in genuine democratic decentralisation." Analyse with reference to RGSA.

In this answer
  1. Why capacity is the binding constraint
  2. RGSA's answer — and its limits

The 73rd Amendment (1992) inserted Part IX and the Eleventh Schedule, transferring 29 subjects and reserving one-third seats for women under Article 243-D. Yet devolution of functions and funds without trained functionaries produces panchayats that exist on paper — making capacity-building, delivered chiefly through the Rashtriya Gram Swaraj Abhiyan (RGSA), the decisive third pillar.

Why capacity is the binding constraint

  • Functions without competence: Gram Panchayats must prepare GPDPs ("Sabki Yojana Sabka Vikas"); plan quality depends on representatives who can read a budget and conduct gap analysis [4].
  • Funds without absorptive capacity: the 15th Finance Commission earmarked about ₹2.36 lakh crore for Rural Local Bodies (2021-26), including ₹1.42 lakh crore tied grants for water and sanitation — untrained bodies underspend or misallocate [2][3].
  • Digital devolution: eGramSwaraj, integrated with PFMS and available in 22 languages, shifts accounting and vendor payments online; without digital literacy the portal becomes a compliance ritual [3].
  • Social inclusion: first-time women, SC and ST representatives elected under Article 243-D need orientation to convert reserved seats into real authority.

RGSA's answer — and its limits

  • Revamped as a Centrally Sponsored Scheme (2022-26), RGSA funds orientation training within six months of election and refresher training within two years, plus thematic, GPDP and specialised modules [1][5].
  • Crores of elected representatives have been trained, supported by Sashakt Panchayat Netri Abhiyan for women leaders [1].
  • Limits: training is episodic, quality varies across states, and it cannot substitute for activity mapping, own-source revenue or staff support — the parallel gaps in devolution.

Capacity-building is therefore necessary though not sufficient: it converts formal devolution into functional self-government. Institutionalising continuous, mentored training linked to GPDP outcomes, alongside genuine transfer of functions, funds and functionaries, would realise the Article 40 vision of panchayats as units of self-government and localise the SDGs on the road to Viksit Bharat @2047.

Sources

  1. 1Capacity Building of Elected Panchayat Representatives, PIB/MoPRtraining of elected representatives, women leaders' initiative
  2. 2Finance Commission Grants to Panchayati Raj Institutions, PIB/MoPR15th FC devolution to rural local bodies
  3. 3₹1.42 lakh crore tied grant to Panchayats for water & sanitation (2021-22 to 2025-26), PIBtied grants; eGramSwaraj–PFMS integration
  4. 4Gram Panchayat Development Plan, PIB/MoPRGPDP planning framework
  5. 5Cabinet approval, revamped Centrally Sponsored Scheme RGSA (01.04.2022–31.03.2026), PIBRGSA scheme design and training cycle

More from this note

More on Polity