·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

What is the 'cash paradox' in the Indian economy? Examine why rising digital transactions have not led to a proportional decline in cash in circulation.

In this answer
  1. The paradox stated
  2. Why CIC has not fallen proportionally

The 'cash paradox' describes the co-existence of two apparently contradictory trends in India — a rapid expansion of digital payments alongside a continuing rise in currency in circulation (CIC). The paradox, on closer examination, is largely apparent rather than real.

The paradox stated

  • UPI transaction volumes grew about 22.5% year-on-year in August 2026, with value up roughly 20%, yet CIC has not contracted correspondingly [3].
  • RBI Deputy Governor Shirish Chandra Murmu holds that this is "no paradox": cash performs a dual role — a medium of transaction and a store of value — while digital modes substitute only the first [3].

Why CIC has not fallen proportionally

  • Store-of-value demand: high-denomination notes are held as savings rather than spent, so hoarded cash is insulated from any shift in payment habits [1].
  • Precautionary motive: RBI's Benchmarking India's Payment Systems records surges in cash demand during uncertainty — natural disasters and the COVID-19 pandemic [1].
  • Structural cash dependence: the informal sector, agricultural trade, daily wages and thin-margin rural retail still settle largely in cash.
  • Composition of digital growth: UPI has mainly displaced small-value person-to-person and person-to-merchant payments; high-value and unrecorded transactions remain cash-based.
  • Measurement limitation: India's CIC-to-GDP ratio is high though CIC per person is low, which is why RBI itself calls CIC a sub-optimal indicator of actual cash payment usage [1].
  • Policy design: zero MDR since January 2020, enabled through Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and Section 269SU of the Income-tax Act, 1961, made digital acceptance frictionless without withdrawing the underlying demand for cash [2].

Thus the paradox dissolves once the two functions of money are separated — digital adoption is best judged by transaction volume and value, not by notes outstanding. Going forward, sustaining the less-cash economy will depend on calibrated pricing, such as the merchant-borne 0.4% MDR on high-value payments effective 15 October 2026 [3], and on measuring success through payment data rather than currency stock — advancing the Digital India goal of an inclusive, low-cost payments ecosystem.

Sources

  1. 1RBI, *Benchmarking India's Payment Systems* (July 2022)cash as store of value, demand surges during uncertainty, high CIC-to-GDP with low per-capita CIC, CIC a sub-optimal indicator of cash payments
  2. 2PIB / Ministry of Finance — zero MDR for RuPay Debit Card and BHIM-UPI, and the P2M incentive schemezero MDR since January 2020 via Section 10A, Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and Section 269SU, Income-tax Act, 1961
  3. 3UPI MDR apprehension unlikely to spur higher cash usage: RBI DG Murmu — Business Standard (news)Murmu's "no paradox" explanation, UPI growth of 22.5% YoY in August 2026, and the 0.4% merchant-borne MDR above ₹2,000 from 15 October 2026

More from this note