·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Completed affordable houses lying vacant point to a gap between sanction and outcome in urban housing schemes. Identify the causes and suggest reforms.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Causes of vacancy
  2. Reforms

Under PMAY-U and PMAY-U 2.0, 96.65 lakh houses were completed but only 94.2 lakh are occupied [2]. In 2023, the Standing Committee counted 5,62,858 completed AHP/ISSR houses lying vacant [4]. The scheme tracks output (houses sanctioned and completed), not outcome (houses lived in).

Causes of vacancy

  • 'Complete' without services: houses are counted as finished even when water, roads or power are missing. In Dec 2022, 5.6 lakh houses could not be handed over for this reason [3].
  • Weak ULBs: trunk infrastructure is the ULB's job. Yet ULBs' own revenue covers only 32% of their total revenue, and only 4 of the 18 Twelfth Schedule functions are fully devolved to them [2].
  • Poor location: land can make up 63% of housing cost in metros [2], so AHP flats get pushed to city edges, far from jobs. Only about 30% of completed ISSR houses are occupied [2].
  • Affordability: beneficiaries pay about 60% of the cost of an EWS house, and some States do not pay their share [3].
  • Allotment delays: in Telangana, 96% of completed houses in its 2BHK scheme (merged with the AHP vertical) had not been allotted [5].
  • Sanction-first incentives: the 10th CSMC flagged non-compliant proposals and slow occupancy, yet it approved new AHP projects [1]. PMAY-U spends on average 34% less than its budget [2].

Reforms

  • Measure outcomes: report houses occupied, not houses completed [4]. Link new AHP sanctions to how many of a State's existing AHP houses are occupied.
  • Fund services together with houses: approve AHP only after the trunk services are funded, using the 16th Finance Commission's tied water and sanitation grants to ULBs [2].
  • Rent out empty houses: move unoccupied flats into the ARH vertical, building on the ARHC model [2].
  • Assistance that reflects land cost: vary central help by region and land cost, as the Standing Committee advised [3].
  • Rental ecosystem: get more States to adopt the Model Tenancy Act, 2021 (so far only six have) and lease land banks for rental housing, as NITI Aayog and MoHUA propose [2].
  • Accountable ULBs: hold timely elections and give ULBs the devolution promised under the 74th Amendment.

Empty houses are the result of a scheme that rewards sanctions over habitation. Tying funds to occupancy, building services alongside houses and opening a rental route can turn these structures into homes. That would deliver on the promise of "Housing for All" and on SDG 11's goal of adequate, inclusive urban housing.

Sources

  1. 1PIB: Secretary, DoUD, MoHUA chairs 10th meeting of CSMC under PMAY-U 2.0 (16 Oct 2026)bottlenecks flagged at the 10th CSMC and continued AHP sanctions
  2. 2PRS Legislative Research: Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis, Housing and Urban Affairsoccupancy, ISSR, ULB finances, land cost, underspending, ARHC, Model Tenancy Act, NITI–MoHUA framework, 16th FC grants
  3. 3PRS summary: Standing Committee on Housing and Urban Affairs, Evaluation of Implementation of PMAY (Urban) (2023)5.6 lakh houses not handed over, ~60% beneficiary share, varying central assistance
  4. 4PRS Legislative Research: Demand for Grants 2024-25 Analysis, Housing and Urban Affairs5,62,858 unoccupied AHP/ISSR houses, call to track occupancy
  5. 5CAG Report No. 4 of 2022, General & Economic Sectors, Government of Telangana96% of completed houses not allotted

More from this note