Completed affordable houses lying vacant point to a gap between sanction and outcome in urban housing schemes. Identify the causes and suggest reforms.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
Under PMAY-U and PMAY-U 2.0, 96.65 lakh houses were completed but only 94.2 lakh are occupied [2]. In 2023, the Standing Committee counted 5,62,858 completed AHP/ISSR houses lying vacant [4]. The scheme tracks output (houses sanctioned and completed), not outcome (houses lived in).
Causes of vacancy
- 'Complete' without services: houses are counted as finished even when water, roads or power are missing. In Dec 2022, 5.6 lakh houses could not be handed over for this reason [3].
- Weak ULBs: trunk infrastructure is the ULB's job. Yet ULBs' own revenue covers only 32% of their total revenue, and only 4 of the 18 Twelfth Schedule functions are fully devolved to them [2].
- Poor location: land can make up 63% of housing cost in metros [2], so AHP flats get pushed to city edges, far from jobs. Only about 30% of completed ISSR houses are occupied [2].
- Affordability: beneficiaries pay about 60% of the cost of an EWS house, and some States do not pay their share [3].
- Allotment delays: in Telangana, 96% of completed houses in its 2BHK scheme (merged with the AHP vertical) had not been allotted [5].
- Sanction-first incentives: the 10th CSMC flagged non-compliant proposals and slow occupancy, yet it approved new AHP projects [1]. PMAY-U spends on average 34% less than its budget [2].
Reforms
- Measure outcomes: report houses occupied, not houses completed [4]. Link new AHP sanctions to how many of a State's existing AHP houses are occupied.
- Fund services together with houses: approve AHP only after the trunk services are funded, using the 16th Finance Commission's tied water and sanitation grants to ULBs [2].
- Rent out empty houses: move unoccupied flats into the ARH vertical, building on the ARHC model [2].
- Assistance that reflects land cost: vary central help by region and land cost, as the Standing Committee advised [3].
- Rental ecosystem: get more States to adopt the Model Tenancy Act, 2021 (so far only six have) and lease land banks for rental housing, as NITI Aayog and MoHUA propose [2].
- Accountable ULBs: hold timely elections and give ULBs the devolution promised under the 74th Amendment.
Empty houses are the result of a scheme that rewards sanctions over habitation. Tying funds to occupancy, building services alongside houses and opening a rental route can turn these structures into homes. That would deliver on the promise of "Housing for All" and on SDG 11's goal of adequate, inclusive urban housing.
Sources
- 1PIB: Secretary, DoUD, MoHUA chairs 10th meeting of CSMC under PMAY-U 2.0 (16 Oct 2026)bottlenecks flagged at the 10th CSMC and continued AHP sanctions
- 2PRS Legislative Research: Demand for Grants 2026-27 Analysis, Housing and Urban Affairsoccupancy, ISSR, ULB finances, land cost, underspending, ARHC, Model Tenancy Act, NITI–MoHUA framework, 16th FC grants
- 3PRS summary: Standing Committee on Housing and Urban Affairs, Evaluation of Implementation of PMAY (Urban) (2023)5.6 lakh houses not handed over, ~60% beneficiary share, varying central assistance
- 4PRS Legislative Research: Demand for Grants 2024-25 Analysis, Housing and Urban Affairs5,62,858 unoccupied AHP/ISSR houses, call to track occupancy
- 5CAG Report No. 4 of 2022, General & Economic Sectors, Government of Telangana96% of completed houses not allotted