·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsIR

The concept of 'strategic depth' has historically shaped Pakistan's Afghanistan policy. Analyse its evolution and consequences for regional stability.

In this answer
  1. Evolution of the doctrine
  2. Consequences for regional stability

'Strategic depth' is the Pakistani military doctrine of treating Afghanistan as a rear buffer against India, allowing forces and assets to fall back westward and denying India a foothold on Pakistan's second frontier. Emerging after the Soviet withdrawal, it converted Afghanistan from a neighbour into a strategic asset — a choice whose costs Pakistan is now absorbing.

Evolution of the doctrine

  • Genesis (1980s–90s): the Soviet withdrawal let Pakistan's military leadership recast Afghanistan as strategic depth vis-à-vis India, cultivating allied Islamist and militant proxies [1].
  • Post-9/11 duality: the doctrine produced the "good Taliban/bad Taliban" distinction — coercing groups hostile to Pakistan while sheltering those seen as useful westward [1].
  • Post-2021 reversal: the Taliban's return to Kabul was expected to deliver a friendly western neighbour, but the Afghan Taliban's support enabled the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) to move across the border, complicating Pakistani operations against it [2].
  • Consolidation under Munir: Field Marshal Asim Munir has formalised military dominance through constitutional and legal reform [1] and hardened the line on Kabul, while diversifying westward — the Strategic Mutual Defence Agreement with Saudi Arabia (17 September 2025, Riyadh) makes an attack on one an attack on both [3].

Consequences for regional stability

  • Blowback: the proxy instrument turned inward; TTP violence now makes the Pak-Afghan frontier Pakistan's most active theatre [2].
  • Interstate friction: cross-border strikes and closures have made Pakistan-Afghanistan ties a recurring flashpoint, with the Durand Line unsettled [1].
  • For India: militant infrastructure sustained under the doctrine remains a direct security concern, while Pakistan's new Gulf alignment adds a West Asian dimension — the MEA has said it will study the pact's implications for national security and regional stability [4].

Strategic depth thus evolved from an anti-India buffer into a source of Pakistan's own insecurity, showing that proxies cannot substitute for settled borders. Durable regional stability requires verifiable counter-terror action, normalised Pakistan-Afghanistan borders and revived regional connectivity — the direction India's neighbourhood policy already favours.

Sources

  1. 1Frédéric Grare, *Pakistan-Afghanistan Relations in the Post-9/11 Era*, Carnegie Endowmentorigins of strategic depth after Soviet withdrawal, proxy cultivation, good/bad Taliban duality, Durand Line friction
  2. 2*The Evolution and Future of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan*, Carnegie EndowmentAfghan Taliban support enabling TTP cross-border movement
  3. 3Joint Statement on the State Visit of the Prime Minister of Pakistan to Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, PakistanStrategic Mutual Defence Agreement and its collective-security clause
  4. 4*India reacts to Saudi-Pakistan defence pact*, News Services Division, All India Radio (Prasar Bharati)MEA statement on studying implications for national security and regional stability
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on IR