·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Connectivity is the backbone of heritage tourism. Evaluate India's efforts, from early airline-led promotions to recent schemes.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Strengths of India's efforts
  2. Gaps that remain

Heritage sites yield tourism value only when visitors can reach them. In October 1976, Air-India co-sponsored "Operation Aurangabad" to put the Ajanta–Ellora complex on the world tourism map, using Aurangabad's air links to Delhi and Bombay [1]. India has since moved from promotion to infrastructure, with mixed results.

Strengths of India's efforts

  • Airline–state joint branding: Air-India worked closely with the Government's tourist offices abroad. Its earlier joint campaigns had brought a "significant inflow" of tourists from the U.S., U.K. and Europe [1].
  • Global recognition: Ajanta and Ellora were inscribed as World Heritage Sites in 1983, which raised their international pull [2].
  • Regional air links: Starting with UDAN 3.0, UDAN (2016) added dedicated tourism routes in coordination with the Ministry of Tourism. These made Khajuraho, Deoghar and Amritsar more accessible [3].
  • Destination-based approach: The Iconic Tourist Sites plan covers 17 sites, including Ajanta and Ellora. It bundles connectivity, amenities, skilling and branding [4]. Swadesh Darshan 2.0 has shifted to destination-centric, sustainable development, and PRASAD upgrades amenities at pilgrimage and heritage sites [5].

Gaps that remain

  • Route sustainability: The CAG (Report No. 22 of 2023) found that many awarded UDAN routes were cancelled, for reasons such as airlines shutting down and aerodromes not being ready [6].
  • Institutional silos: The ASI (Ministry of Culture) is the custodian of the sites [2], while tourism bodies and carriers promote them. Protection and promotion need closer coordination.
  • Last-mile access: An airport alone is not enough. Road links, signage and visitor facilities at remote monuments can lag behind air connectivity.
  • Carrying capacity: More visitors at painted caves put pressure on fragile murals, so wider access has to come with visitor management.

India's connectivity effort has grown from one airline's overseas campaign into schemes spanning several ministries, which is substantial but incomplete progress. The way forward is to bring UDAN, Swadesh Darshan 2.0 and ASI conservation plans together around each site, with viable routes, last-mile access and limits on visitor numbers. Connectivity can then support both growth and preservation, in line with Article 49 and the citizen's duty under Article 51A(f) to preserve India's composite heritage.

Sources

  1. 1The Hindu, "Ajanta, Ellora complex to be put on tourism map" (50 years ago column, reprint of a 1976 report)Operation Aurangabad (Oct 1976), Air-India co-sponsorship, overseas tourist offices, inflow from the U.S./U.K./Europe, Delhi–Bombay air links
  2. 2Archaeological Survey of India, World HeritageAjanta and Ellora inscribed in 1983; ASI custodianship
  3. 3PIB, "The Journey of UDAN: Soaring Towards Inclusivity in Indian Aviation"UDAN 2016; tourism routes from UDAN 3.0 with the Ministry of Tourism; Khajuraho, Deoghar and Amritsar access
  4. 4PIB, "Ministry of Tourism has identified 17 sites in 12 clusters… as Iconic Tourist Sites"Ajanta and Ellora among the iconic sites; holistic focus on connectivity, amenities, skilling and branding
  5. 5PIB Factsheet, Swadesh Darshan 2.0 and PRASADdestination-centric sustainable development; PRASAD amenities at pilgrimage and heritage sites
  6. 6CAG, Report No. 22 of 2023: Compliance Audit on the Regional Connectivity Scheme – UDANawarded routes cancelled because airlines shut down or aerodromes were not ready

More from this note