·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Cost and time overruns continue to plague Central Sector projects. Evaluate the role of real-time digital monitoring platforms like PAIMANA.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. The persisting problem
  2. Where PAIMANA adds value
  3. Where it falls short

MoSPI's August 2026 Flash Report tracks 1,731 ongoing Central Sector projects (₹150 crore and above) worth ₹33.60 lakh crore, carrying a cumulative cost overrun of about ₹2.88 lakh crore [1]. PAIMANA, launched in September 2025 to replace OCMS-2006 [2], digitises this oversight — a necessary corrective, but not by itself a cure.

The persisting problem

  • Delayed central projects averaged a time overrun of about 35 months — nearly three years per project [3].
  • The Standing Committee on Energy (2021) found 30 thermal projects with 148 years of cumulative delay and ₹41,100 crore of extra cost; 12 hydro projects added over 100 years and ₹31,530 crore [4].
  • Causes lie largely outside the executing ministry: land acquisition, forest and environment clearances, resettlement, utility shifting and contract disputes [5].

Where PAIMANA adds value

  • Early detection: financial and physical progress are tracked project-wise; 647 projects (38%) crossed 80% physical progress against only 312 (18%) financially [1], flagging mismatches for review.
  • Data integrity: API integration with DPIIT's IPMP auto-updates nearly 60% of projects, cutting manual error and lag [2].
  • Accountability: a common dashboard across 17 ministries feeds PRAGATI, the Prime Minister's video-conference review with States and districts [5].
  • It answers a parliamentary demand — the Energy Committee itself sought IT-based monitoring [4].

Where it falls short

  • Monitoring records a stalled project; it cannot deliver land, clearances or a court order [5].
  • Data is largely self-reported by the agency being judged, which also decides when a project is "revised" rather than "delayed" [2].
  • Nearly two decades of OCMS monitoring did not prevent these overruns [2].

PAIMANA is therefore an enabler of transparency rather than a solution to delay. Its promise will be realised when monthly releases publish time and cost overrun alongside spending, when single-window clearance replaces department-by-department chasing [4], and when land and clearances precede contract award — converting real-time visibility into real-time correction.

Sources

  1. 1Flash Report on Central Sector Infrastructure Projects, August 2026 — PIB/MoSPI1,731 projects, ₹33.60 lakh crore revised cost, 48.59% expenditure, cost overrun of ~₹2.88 lakh crore, physical vs financial progress bands
  2. 2PAIMANA Portal and Management of Major Infrastructure Projects — PIBlaunch on 25 Sep 2025 replacing OCMS-2006, ₹150 crore threshold, IPMP API integration covering ~60% of projects
  3. 3Flash Report on Central Sector Infrastructure Projects Costing ₹150 crore and above, May 2024 — MoSPIaverage time overrun of about 35 months in delayed projects
  4. 4Report Summary: Delay in Execution/Completion of Power Projects — Standing Committee on Energy (5 August 2021), PRS India148 years and ₹41,100 crore overrun in 30 thermal projects; 100+ years and ₹31,530 crore in 12 hydro projects; single-window clearance and IT-based monitoring recommendations
  5. 5PRAGATI: A Model of Real-Time Governance — PIBcauses of project delay (land acquisition, clearances, resettlement, utility shifting, contract disputes) and PRAGATI review mechanism with States and districts

More from this note