·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Cost and time overruns continue to plague Central Sector projects. Evaluate the role of real-time digital monitoring platforms like PAIMANA.

In this answer
  1. The persisting problem
  2. Where PAIMANA adds value
  3. Where it falls short

MoSPI's August 2026 Flash Report tracks 1,731 ongoing Central Sector projects (₹150 crore and above) worth ₹33.60 lakh crore, carrying a cumulative cost overrun of about ₹2.88 lakh crore [1]. PAIMANA, launched in September 2025 to replace OCMS-2006 [2], digitises this oversight — a necessary corrective, but not by itself a cure.

The persisting problem

  • Delayed central projects averaged a time overrun of about 35 months — nearly three years per project [3].
  • The Standing Committee on Energy (2021) found 30 thermal projects with 148 years of cumulative delay and ₹41,100 crore of extra cost; 12 hydro projects added over 100 years and ₹31,530 crore [4].
  • Causes lie largely outside the executing ministry: land acquisition, forest and environment clearances, resettlement, utility shifting and contract disputes [5].

Where PAIMANA adds value

  • Early detection: financial and physical progress are tracked project-wise; 647 projects (38%) crossed 80% physical progress against only 312 (18%) financially [1], flagging mismatches for review.
  • Data integrity: API integration with DPIIT's IPMP auto-updates nearly 60% of projects, cutting manual error and lag [2].
  • Accountability: a common dashboard across 17 ministries feeds PRAGATI, the Prime Minister's video-conference review with States and districts [5].
  • It answers a parliamentary demand — the Energy Committee itself sought IT-based monitoring [4].

Where it falls short

  • Monitoring records a stalled project; it cannot deliver land, clearances or a court order [5].
  • Data is largely self-reported by the agency being judged, which also decides when a project is "revised" rather than "delayed" [2].
  • Nearly two decades of OCMS monitoring did not prevent these overruns [2].

PAIMANA is therefore an enabler of transparency rather than a solution to delay. Its promise will be realised when monthly releases publish time and cost overrun alongside spending, when single-window clearance replaces department-by-department chasing [4], and when land and clearances precede contract award — converting real-time visibility into real-time correction.

Sources

  1. 1Flash Report on Central Sector Infrastructure Projects, August 2026 — PIB/MoSPI1,731 projects, ₹33.60 lakh crore revised cost, 48.59% expenditure, cost overrun of ~₹2.88 lakh crore, physical vs financial progress bands
  2. 2PAIMANA Portal and Management of Major Infrastructure Projects — PIBlaunch on 25 Sep 2025 replacing OCMS-2006, ₹150 crore threshold, IPMP API integration covering ~60% of projects
  3. 3Flash Report on Central Sector Infrastructure Projects Costing ₹150 crore and above, May 2024 — MoSPIaverage time overrun of about 35 months in delayed projects
  4. 4Report Summary: Delay in Execution/Completion of Power Projects — Standing Committee on Energy (5 August 2021), PRS India148 years and ₹41,100 crore overrun in 30 thermal projects; 100+ years and ₹31,530 crore in 12 hydro projects; single-window clearance and IT-based monitoring recommendations
  5. 5PRAGATI: A Model of Real-Time Governance — PIBcauses of project delay (land acquisition, clearances, resettlement, utility shifting, contract disputes) and PRAGATI review mechanism with States and districts

More from this note