·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomy

Critically analyse the amendments proposed by the Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 to the payment ecosystem.

In this answer
  1. What the Bill changes
  2. Merits
  3. Concerns

Since 1 January 2020, Merchant Discount Rate (MDR) on BHIM-UPI and RuPay debit cards has been zero, secured through Section 10A of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 and Section 269SU of the Income-tax Act [3]. The 2026 Bill recasts this architecture — an enabling shift whose merits are real but whose equity risks demand calibration.

What the Bill changes

  • Recasts Section 10A, PSS Act 2007: instead of a blanket statutory bar, the Centre may now notify which electronic payment systems enjoy zero MDR [1].
  • Passed by Lok Sabha, it authorises government to permit banks and payment service providers to levy charges on notified digital payment modes [2].
  • The levy is not automatic — it requires a fresh notification, with rate-setting left to the NPCI-anchored UPI steering mechanism [1].

Merits

  • Fiscal sustainability: zero-MDR shifted infrastructure costs to the exchequer via recurring subsidies — the Cabinet approved a ₹1,500 crore incentive scheme for low-value BHIM-UPI (P2M) transactions [4]. A user-pays element reduces this dependence.
  • Ecosystem viability: a revenue stream funds cybersecurity, fraud prevention and capacity as volumes scale, and attracts new players rather than concentrating the market in a few apps.
  • Calibrated design: government and industry have clarified that consumers and small merchants remain free, with any MDR confined to large merchants above a threshold [5].

Concerns

  • Inclusion risk: merchants may pass costs to consumers, eroding UPI's near-zero-friction advantage that drove mass adoption [5].
  • Policy credibility: repeated Finance Ministry assurances of "no plan" to levy MDR [3], followed by this amendment, unsettle expectations.
  • Regulatory ambiguity: an enabling provision without notified rates leaves merchants and PSPs planning in uncertainty.

On balance, the Bill wisely converts an inflexible statutory prohibition into a calibrated policy lever. Its success now rests on transparent, threshold-based notification that shields small merchants and consumers — sustaining UPI as Digital Public Infrastructure serving financial inclusion, not merely as a revenue base.

Sources

  1. 1The Taxation and Other Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2026 — PRS Legislative Researchamendment to Section 10A, PSS Act 2007; notification-based zero-MDR framework
  2. 2Lok Sabha passes bill to authorise govt to permit banks to levy charges on UPI transactions — Akashvani Newspassage and enabling provision
  3. 3Finance Ministry says there is no plan to levy MDR charge on UPI transactions — Akashvani Newszero MDR since 1 Jan 2020 via Sec 10A PSS Act and Sec 269SU Income-tax Act; earlier government assurances
  4. 4Cabinet approves Incentive Scheme for promotion of low-value BHIM-UPI transactions (P2M) — PIB₹1,500 crore subsidy outlay compensating the ecosystem for zero MDR
  5. 5UPI transactions to remain free for consumers & small merchants — Akashvani Newsconsumer/small-merchant exemption and pass-through concern
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy