·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomy

Critically evaluate India's flexible inflation targeting regime a decade after its adoption, in light of recent global oil price volatility.

In this answer
  1. Merits demonstrated over the decade
  2. Limitations exposed by oil price volatility

India adopted flexible inflation targeting (FIT) in 2016 by amending the RBI Act, 1934, creating a statutory six-member Monetary Policy Committee under Section 45ZB to hold CPI inflation at 4% ± 2% [3]. A decade on, its disinflationary record is strong, but renewed food-and-fuel pressure amid global crude volatility tests its resilience to supply shocks.

Merits demonstrated over the decade

  • Lower, steadier inflation: average inflation fell to 4.9% post-adoption from 6.8% earlier, with volatility (standard deviation) narrowing from 2.3% to 1.5% [2].
  • Anchored expectations: CPI stayed below the 4% target for 16 consecutive months before edging up to 4.4% in June 2026 [1].
  • Rule-based, transparent institution: MPC decisions are binding on the RBI, with minutes published 14 days later — a rare accountability mechanism among Indian regulators [3][1].
  • Built-in flexibility: the ±2% band allowed the MPC to unanimously hold the repo rate at 5.25% in August 2026 despite rising headline inflation, since core inflation remained benign [1].

Limitations exposed by oil price volatility

  • Headline targeting captures food and fuel, which form over half the consumption basket [2]; imported crude shocks thus force a monetary response to inflation the repo rate cannot cure.
  • FY2026-27 inflation is projected at 5.0%, driven mainly by food and fuel rather than demand [1] — tightening here risks needlessly sacrificing growth.
  • Communication risk: the hawkish tilt of the August 2026 minutes, relative to the resolution's tone, unsettled bond markets and hardened G-sec yields, raising the government's borrowing cost [4].
  • Fuel taxation and buffer-stock management remain fiscal levers outside MPC control, limiting coordination.

FIT has demonstrably delivered price stability and institutional credibility; its strain lies in external supply shocks, not in design failure. The way forward is calibrated — retain headline targeting for credibility, while strengthening fiscal-monetary coordination, energy-import diversification and clearer forward guidance, so that price stability continues to underwrite sustainable growth.

Sources

  1. 1RBI, Monetary Policy Statement 2026-27 — Resolution of the MPC, August 3–5, 2026repo rate held at 5.25%, CPI at 4.4% in June 2026 after 16 months below target, FY27 projection of 5.0% driven by food and fuel, benign core, minutes published 19 August 2026
  2. 2PRS Legislative Research — Review of the Monetary Policy Framework by RBIaverage inflation 4.9% vs 6.8% pre-FIT, volatility 2.3%→1.5%, food and fuel over 50% of the consumption basket
  3. 3PIB, Ministry of Finance — Statutory and Institutionalised Framework for Monetary Policy; Inflation Target of Four Percentstatutory MPC under RBI Act, 1934, 4% ± 2% target, binding decisions and published minutes
  4. 4"Investors dump India bonds after hawkish RBI minutes", The Hindu Business Line, 21 August 2026 (link not verifiable at time of writing) — hardening of government bond yields following the August 2026 minutes
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy