·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsGeographyEnvironment

Critically evaluate the role of biosphere reserves like the Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve in reconciling development and conservation objectives.

In this answer
  1. Where the model works
  2. Where it falls short

Biosphere reserves seek to harmonise conservation with human use through a zoned core–buffer–transition design. The Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve (NBR), constituted in 1986 and India's first entrant into UNESCO's World Network in 2000, spans 5,520 sq km across Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala [1] — making it the sharpest test of this reconciliation.

Where the model works

  • Landscape-scale contiguity: NBR knits Bandipur, Nagarahole, Mudumalai and Wayanad into one unit, sustaining India's largest wild Asian elephant population and enabling interstate corridor management [1][2].
  • Zonation permits regulated development: buffer and transition zones legitimise tourism, plantations and settlements, so conservation is not a blanket prohibition on livelihoods.
  • Institutional convergence: Elephant Reserves overlap Tiger Reserves, sanctuaries and reserved forests protected under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Indian Forest Act, 1927, layering statutory teeth over the biosphere framework [3].
  • Scientific basis for corridors: MoEFCC and State Forest Departments have ground-validated 150 elephant corridors across 15 range states, directing states to protect them [2].

Where it falls short

  • No independent legal status: the biosphere reserve label is administrative; protection depends entirely on underlying laws, so unprotected corridor land remains vulnerable.
  • Irreversible fragmentation from infrastructure: the Kabini reservoir, with encroachments in Kerala's Pulpally vested forest, split this habitat almost into two and severed traditional elephant migration routes — a loss zonation cannot undo [4].
  • Weak enforcement and coordination: encroachment persists, and a single ecological landscape is administered by three separate state forest departments.
  • Conflict costs fall on the fringe: blocked movement pushes herds into farmland, and human–elephant conflict remains Project Elephant's standing concern [5].

On balance, biosphere reserves are enabling frameworks rather than guarantees — effective at organising science and cooperation, weak at resisting large projects. Strengthening them requires statutory notification of validated corridors, a joint interstate NBR management authority, and mandatory corridor-impact appraisal for infrastructure, so that ecological connectivity and development planning advance together.

Sources

  1. 1Nilgiri — UNESCO Man and the Biosphere ProgrammeNBR area 5,520 sq km, three states, constituted 1986, UNESCO World Network 2000
  2. 2Right of Passage: Elephant Corridors of India, 2023 — MoEFCC150 ground-validated corridors across 15 elephant range states
  3. 333 Elephant Reserves established in 14 major elephant States — PIBElephant Reserves overlap protected areas under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 and Indian Forest Act, 1927
  4. 4Kabini project has cut off routes of elephants — The Hindu (archival report)reservoir plus Pulpally encroachments split the habitat and severed elephant migration routes
  5. 5Project Elephant — Introduction, MoEFCCprotection of habitats and corridors and mitigation of human–animal conflict as scheme objectives
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Geography