·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsIR

Critically examine the significance of the Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technology (iCET) in transforming India–U.S. relations from a buyer-seller defence partnership to a co-production ecosystem.

In this answer
  1. How iCET enables the shift
  2. Limits of the transformation

Announced in May 2022 and co-led by the two National Security Councils, iCET aimed to move India–U.S. ties beyond arms sales towards joint creation of technology [1]. Its record is genuinely transformative in design, but uneven in delivery.

How iCET enables the shift

  • Institutional relocation: iCET is steered by the National Security Councils rather than procurement bureaucracies, linking government, academia and industry across AI, quantum, 5G/6G, biotech, space and semiconductors [1].
  • Ecosystem, not transaction: INDUS-X (June 2023) created a network of startups, incubators, universities and investors, connecting India's iDEX with the U.S. Defense Innovation Unit [2].
  • Tangible co-production: negotiation of GE F-414 engine technology transfer for Tejas Mk-2 marks an unprecedented depth of U.S. jet-engine technology sharing [3].
  • Policy commitment: both governments pledged to adapt regulations enabling technology sharing, co-development and co-production, and extended cooperation to semiconductors and space [4].

Limits of the transformation

  • Scale remains buyer-seller: defence procurement from the U.S. exceeds US$20 billion, still dominated by platform purchases rather than jointly built systems [5].
  • Regulatory friction: U.S. export-control regimes (ITAR/EAR) slow transfers despite India's Major Defence Partner status (2016), which is not treaty-alliance status [5].
  • Political volatility: trade and tariff disputes, and the postponement of the Quad Leaders' Summit, show the technology track advancing despite, not because of, political warmth.
  • Nomenclature churn: rebranding iCET as TRUST signals continuity but also dependence on administration preferences.

iCET's real achievement is institutional: it has embedded a working-level channel that survives political turbulence and reframes the relationship around co-creation. Converting this promise into scale requires faster export-control reform, sustained funding for INDUS-X startups, and firm domestic absorption capacity through Atmanirbhar Bharat. Anchored in mutual strategic interest rather than alliance obligation, iCET can make India a co-producer, preserving strategic autonomy while deepening partnership.

Sources

  1. 1PIB — Prime Minister's meeting with President of the United States of America (24 May 2022)iCET launch, NSC co-leadership, technology domains
  2. 2PIB — India–United States Defence Acceleration Ecosystem (INDUS-X) launched in Washington DCstartup/incubator/investor network, June 2023
  3. 3MEA — India–U.S. Joint Statement, 13 February 2025GE F-414 engine technology transfer for Tejas
  4. 4PIB — Joint Fact Sheet: The United States and India Continue to Expand Comprehensive and Global Strategic Partnershipco-development/co-production and regulatory commitments
  5. 5MEA — India–US Bilateral Relations Brief (January 2025)Major Defence Partner designation (2016); defence procurement above US$20 billion
Practice
4 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on IR