·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Despite repeated hospital fire tragedies, systemic fire-safety compliance in India remains weak. Examine the administrative and regulatory gaps responsible, with reference to recent incidents.

In this answer
  1. A recurring pattern of "new-age fires"
  2. Regulatory gaps
  3. Administrative gaps

Fire and life safety in buildings is governed by the National Building Code (NBC) of India, a Bureau of Indian Standards document that is recommendatory, not statutory [2]. This design gap — norms without enforceable teeth — explains why hospital fires recur despite each tragedy triggering fresh advisories.

A recurring pattern of "new-age fires"

  • Risk has migrated from factories and mass gatherings to hospitals, hotels and residences, with electrical short circuits the dominant trigger.
  • The Jhansi Maharani Laxmibai Medical College NICU fire (15 November 2024) killed at least ten newborns, injured 16 and forced 37 rescues; police confirmed a short circuit, and the NHRC took suo motu cognizance, noticing the Chief Secretary and DGP [1].
  • August 2026 saw NICU fires recur in Amravati (Maharashtra) and Chhindwara (Madhya Pradesh) — traced to a ventilator and a warmer respectively — showing 2024 was not a turning point.

Regulatory gaps

  • Fire services are a State subject; the NBC binds only where States adopt it into building bye-laws, producing uneven compliance despite MHA advisories [2].
  • The Model Fire Service Bill, 2019 remains a template, with patchy State enactment and weak penalties [5].
  • No dedicated statute for critical-care units, whose oxygen-rich, sealed environments burn and fill with smoke faster than ordinary buildings.

Administrative gaps

  • Compliance is certificate-driven: fire NOCs are obtained once, while functional checks of alarms, hydrants and extinguishers lapse [3].
  • Electrical load in ICUs outstrips ageing wiring; bi-annual electrical audits are newly mandated precisely because they were absent [3].
  • Overcrowding beyond sanctioned beds and untrained staff cripple evacuation of patients who cannot self-evacuate [4].
  • Repeated inquiries end without systemic follow-through.

The gap is therefore of enforcement, not of knowledge. The National Guidelines on Fire and Life Safety in Healthcare Facilities (2026) — mandating periodic audits, functional firefighting systems and IHIP-based reporting — must be backed by statutory State fire laws, third-party audits and accountability for lapses [3]. Protecting the newborn in an incubator is the minimum content of the Article 21 right to life.

Sources

  1. 1NHRC takes suo motu cognizance of the fire in Maharani Laxmibai Medical College, Jhansi — PIB, 18 Nov 2024Jhansi NICU fire toll, short-circuit cause, NHRC notices
  2. 2National Building Code of India (Fire and Life Safety) — Directorate General Fire Services, Civil Defence & Home Guards, MHANBC is recommendatory; States must adopt it into bye-laws
  3. 3Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare launches Nationwide Fire Safety Week — PIB, 2026National Guidelines on Fire and Life Safety in Healthcare Facilities (2026), fire NOC, bi-annual electrical audits, IHIP reporting
  4. 4Union Health Ministry–NDMA joint advisory to States on preventing hospital fires — PIBevacuation preparedness and staff training in hospitals
  5. 5Revised Model Fire Service Bill, 2019 — DGFS, CD & HG, MHA.pdf) — model legislation left to State adoption

More from this note