·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomyIR

"Despite a robust legal framework, accessibility for persons with disabilities remains a promise deferred." Examine this with reference to India's aviation sector.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. A robust framework on paper
  2. Why the promise remains deferred
  3. Way forward

India is the world's third-largest aviation market, with more than 350 million passengers a year [1]. Yet a 2026 Supreme Court PIL alleges a "systemic failure" to give persons with disabilities (PwDs) dignified air travel [1]. The gap lies in enforcement, not in law.

A robust framework on paper

  • Constitutional: Articles 14 and 21 (life with dignity) support a right to travel independently and with dignity [1].
  • Statutory: Under the RPwD Act, 2016, Section 40 requires accessibility standards and Sections 44–46 and 89 penalise non-compliance [2].
  • Sectoral: DGCA's CAR Section 3, Series 'M', Part I bars discrimination and requires assistance. Priority security screening is provided at AAI, JV and PPP airports [3].
  • Programmatic: The Accessible India Campaign (2015) targets accessible airports and ICT [4].

Why the promise remains deferred

  • Standards were advisory, not binding: In Rajive Raturi v. Union of India (2024), the Supreme Court struck down Rule 15 of the RPwD Rules, 2017 as ultra vires because it left standards to self-regulation. It ordered mandatory rules within three months [2]. Aviation standards drafted on MoSJE's direction remain pending [3], so the penalties cannot apply.
  • Features are counted, not checked: Officially, 35 international and 55 domestic airports have ramps, accessible toilets and Braille [5]. The plea, however, cites broken equipment [1].
  • A narrow idea of access: Ramps help wheelchair users, but visually and hearing-impaired passengers face "silent airports" with no other way to communicate [1].
  • Digital exclusion: Digi Yatra and booking interfaces were not built to be accessible from the start [1].
  • Split accountability: The Court had to issue notice to five bodies: MoCA, DGCA, AAI, CISF and the Digi Yatra Foundation [1].
  • The burden falls on the passenger: MoCA advises PwDs to request assistance in advance [6]. Access comes on request, not by default.

Way forward

  • Notify the aviation standards as mandatory, with RPwD Act penalties attached [2].
  • DGCA should audit whether equipment works and publish results airport by airport.
  • Apply accessible-ICT norms to Digi Yatra and keep a staffed non-digital option [4].

India's aviation accessibility framework is sound in design but weak in delivery. Binding standards, audits of working equipment and universal design in fast-expanding terminals can turn judicial scrutiny into lasting reform. That would deliver Article 21's promise of dignity, the UNCRPD's accessibility mandate and SDG 10's goal of inclusion.

Sources

  1. 1"SC flags accessibility gaps in aviation infrastructure", The Hindu, 8 Oct 2026 (news report)market size, "systemic failure", silent airports, broken equipment, digital exclusion, five respondents
  2. 2Rajive Raturi v. Union of India, W.P.(C) No. 243 of 2005, Judgment dated 08-Nov-2024 (2024 INSC 858)Rule 15 held ultra vires; mandatory rules under Section 40 within three months; penalties under Sections 44–46 and 89
  3. 3PIB: Priority treatment during security check for persons with disability at AAI, JV and PPP airportsDGCA CAR Series 'M' Part I; priority screening; aviation standards drafted on MoSJE's direction
  4. 4PIB: Accessible India Campaign to achieve universal accessibility for persons with disabilities launched2015 launch; airport and ICT accessibility targets
  5. 5PIB: Accessible India Campaign: An Inclusive Society Creates a Sashakt Bharat (2023)35 international and 55 domestic airports with ramps, accessible toilets and Braille
  6. 6Ministry of Civil Aviation: Travel with ease! Passengers with disabilities can request special assistanceadvance-request model of assistance
Practice
7 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity