·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Developing countries must shape, not merely adopt, global technology standards. Discuss in the context of India's role at the ITU.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why shaping the rules matters
  2. India's role at the ITU
  3. Constraints
  4. Way forward

The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) is a UN specialised agency. Its technical standards and spectrum rules decide how much networks cost, how they are designed and how secure they are. At the ITU Plenipotentiary Conference (PP-26) in Doha in November 2026, India argued that developing countries must help shape these rules, "not merely adopt them" [1]. Behind this demand lie digital equity and strategic autonomy.

Why shaping the rules matters

  • Equity: 2.2 billion people are still offline, mostly in the Global South [1]. Standards built for rich urban markets make rural rollout more expensive.
  • Economic: countries that only adopt standards pay royalties and import equipment. Countries that write them capture value and build domestic manufacturing.
  • Spectrum: frequencies are allocated in global forums. These decisions shape whether poorer states can get affordable broadband and satellite access.
  • Security: cyber threats cross borders, so the countries most exposed need a say in the rules [1].

India's role at the ITU

  • Standards leadership: India's pioneering resolutions won global backing at WTSA-24, held in New Delhi [2].
  • Institutional voice: India is bidding to host PP-2030 and seeking re-election to the ITU Council (2027–30) [3].
  • Models others can copy: BharatNet (about $15 bn of public investment) supports the Samriddh Gram Centres, a WSIS Prize winner. India also has 100 5G use-case labs and the Bharat 6G Vision, which brings telecom, AI and satellites together [1].
  • South–South cooperation: at PP-26, India held bilateral talks with Malaysia, Iran and Uzbekistan on cyber fraud and quantum cooperation [1].

Constraints

  • Weak R&D and patent base: standards bodies are dominated by firms that hold large patent portfolios.
  • Gap between claims and results at home: CAG found only 17.91% of BharatNet bandwidth in use and average fault repair times of 17 days [4]. Only about 30% of Gram Panchayats had a working connection [5].

Way forward

  • Fund indigenous standards research and send industry and academia to ITU study groups.
  • Build a Global South caucus to push shared spectrum positions.
  • Make sure the network is actually used, through state fibre-leasing policies and state-wise audits [5].

India's ITU record shows that standard-takers can become standard-shapers if they bring technical capacity and proven models. If India pairs its diplomacy at Doha with stronger R&D and better use of its own networks, it can make global technology rules fairer. That would support SDG 9 (resilient infrastructure) and the principle of leaving no one offline.

Sources

  1. 1PIB: "Cyber Threats Respect No Borders, Neither Should Cooperation: Union MoS for Communications Dr. Chandra Sekhar Pemmasani at ITU PP-26""shape, not merely adopt"; 2.2 bn offline; BharatNet; Samriddh Gram; 5G labs; 6G Vision; bilateral partners
  2. 2PIB: ITU-WTSA 2024 Concludes: India Leads the Charge for Shaping the Future of Telecommunications/ICTIndia's resolutions won global backing at WTSA-24
  3. 3PIB: India Strengthens Global Telecom Leadership at ITU Council 2026 in GenevaPP-2030 hosting bid; ITU Council re-election 2027–30
  4. 4CAG Audit Report No. 19 of 2026 (BharatNet)17.91% bandwidth use; 17-day repair time
  5. 5PRS: Review of Schemes/Projects under Digital Bharat Nidhiabout 30% of GPs with working connections; state-wise audit and leasing recommendations

More from this note