·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

How did colonial monetary arrangements in South Asia shape post-independence currency institutions? Illustrate with reference to India and Sri Lanka.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Colonial monetary arrangements
  2. Impact on post-independence institutions

Colonial monetary systems in South Asia were built to keep currency stable and convertible for imperial trade. They were not built to steer domestic growth. Who issued money and who managed it under colonial rule decided whether India and Sri Lanka inherited a central bank or had to build one.

Colonial monetary arrangements

  • India had a late, imperial-scale central bank. The Government's Controller of Currency managed currency until the Hilton Young Commission (1926) recommended a central bank. The RBI Act, 1934 then created a shareholder-owned RBI, which began work on 1 April 1935 [1].
  • The RBI served the whole region. It was the central bank for Burma until 1947 and for Pakistan until June 1948 [1].
  • Ceylon had a Currency Board. The Paper Currency Ordinance, 1884 set up a board with very narrow powers [2]. It was run by the Treasurer, Colonial Secretary and Auditor General [3], so it managed currency issue as routine administration and had no monetary policy.
  • No one owned public communication about money. In 1926, a Colombo rumour that "the Treasury" would pay two rupees for every 1924 cent drew crowds [6].

Impact on post-independence institutions

India: continuity and adaptation

  • It inherited a working central bank and nationalised it in 1949 [1].
  • The RBI's mandate grew to include development. It helped set up IDBI and NABARD [1].
  • The colonial split survives. The Government mints coins under the Coinage Act, 2011, and the RBI only distributes them (Sec. 38, RBI Act) [4]. So when rumours spread that ₹10 coins were fake, the RBI had to publicly confirm they were legal tender and tell banks to accept them [5].

Sri Lanka: a clean break

  • The currency board was judged inadequate for an independent developing country [2].
  • A US Federal Reserve economist, John Exter, was brought in (1948). His report led to the Monetary Law Act No. 58 of 1949 and the Central Bank of Ceylon, which began work on 28 August 1950 [2].
  • The new bank got the sole right to issue currency, custody of foreign reserves, and objectives that included employment and development [2].
India:  Controller of Currency → RBI 1935 (private) → nationalised 1949
Ceylon: Currency Board 1884 → Exter Report → Central Bank 1950

Fig: Colonial legacy to national institution

In both countries, colonial arrangements set the starting point: India adapted the central bank it inherited, while Sri Lanka had to create one. Today both central banks have moved towards price stability as their main aim; Sri Lanka's 2023 CBSL Act made it the primary objective [2]. Stronger public communication and financial literacy would complete this shift from colonial currency management to trusted national monetary authorities.

Sources

  1. 1RBI – Brief History (Hilton Young Commission, RBI Act 1934, nationalisation 1949)RBI's origins, regional role, nationalisation, role in setting up IDBI/NABARD
  2. 2Central Bank of Sri Lanka – Bank History1884 Currency Board, John Exter, Monetary Law Act 1949, 1950 start, powers, 2023 Act
  3. 3Central Bank of Sri Lanka – History of Currency in Sri Lankawho sat on the Board of Commissioners of Currency (1884–1950)
  4. 4RBI – FAQ: Indian Currency (updated 15 April 2025)Coinage Act 2011; Government mints coins; RBI distributes them under Sec. 38
  5. 5RBI Press Release – ₹10 coins of all designs are legal tenderRBI clarification and instruction to banks to accept coins
  6. 6"Rs. Two for a copper", The Hindu, "A hundred years ago", 28 Sept 2026the 1926 Colombo Treasury rumour

More from this note