·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss how Alternative Investment Funds can help channel domestic savings into start-ups and high-growth enterprises. What regulatory safeguards are needed?

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. How AIFs channel domestic savings
  2. Regulatory safeguards needed

Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs) are privately pooled vehicles regulated under the SEBI (AIF) Regulations, 2012. They put money into unlisted and high-growth firms. SEBI now wants to grow the pool of eligible accredited investors from about 1 lakh to 4 lakh [4]. AIFs can become a strong domestic source of risk capital, but only if wider access comes with proportionate safeguards.

How AIFs channel domestic savings

  • Pooling risk capital: Professional managers direct HNI and institutional savings into unlisted start-ups. This reduces dependence on foreign VC/PE [4].
  • Accredited Investor (AI) route: Under Regulation 2(ab), investors with income of ₹2 crore or more, or net worth of ₹7.5 crore or more, can invest below the ₹1 crore minimum [2].
  • Large Value Funds (LVFs): SEBI has proposed cutting the threshold from ₹70 crore to ₹25 crore. LVFs already held ₹1,34,752 crore in commitments as of June 2025 [1].
  • Easier verification: A proposal would accept eCAS statements as proof for individuals holding ₹5 crore or more in securities [4].
  • Untapped base: India had fewer than 1,000 registered AIs against about 72,000 AIF investors, which leaves large headroom [1].

Regulatory safeguards needed

  • Knowledge-based accreditation: Wealth does not prove an investor understands risk. In SEBI's consultation, 8 of 20 commenters asked for a skill-based route [1].
  • Protect smaller AIs: AI-only schemes may waive pari-passu rights and extend fund life by up to 5 years with consent from two-thirds of investors by value. Both need limits so that large holders do not dominate [1].
  • Trustee independence: SEBI itself admits the rules set no independence standard for trustees. One is needed before oversight passes to managers [1].
  • Anti-circumvention: RBI's December 2023 curbs stopped banks and NBFCs from using AIFs to evergreen loans [3]. Similar vigilance must continue as the pool grows.
  • Phased expansion: SEBI should move in stages, as it has committed to, and publish data on take-up and complaints at each step [1].

In short, AIFs can turn passive domestic wealth into patient capital for innovation. The way forward is calibrated reform: widen eligibility while improving trustee standards, testing investor sophistication and keeping disclosure strong. This balances investor protection with capital formation, as SEBI's mandate requires, and supports Startup India and SDG 8 (decent work and economic growth).

Sources

  1. 1SEBI Board Memorandum: Proposals to give a regulatory fillip to Accredited Investors (Sep 2025): ₹25 crore LVF proposal, LVF commitments, AI numbers, pari-passu and tenure waivers, trustee independence, consultation feedback, phased approach
  2. 2SEBI FAQs for grant of registration as AIF (Jan 2025): Regulation 2(ab) accredited investor criteria and relaxed minimums
  3. 3RBI Circular: Investments in Alternative Investment Funds (19 Dec 2023): curbs on bank and NBFC investment in AIFs to prevent evergreening
  4. 4The Hindu: SEBI targets 4 lakh accredited investors via expanded AIF (15 Oct 2026): 1 lakh to 4 lakh target, eCAS proposal, risk capital for high-growth firms

More from this note