·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss the financial pressures on Indian Railways' operating ratio and suggest how staff incentives can be aligned with efficiency goals.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Financial pressures on the Operating Ratio
  2. Aligning staff incentives with efficiency
  3. Proposed incentive cycle:

The Operating Ratio (OR) is the share of traffic receipts that Railways spends on working expenses. It stood at 98.9% in 2024-25 (RE) and is budgeted at 98.43% for 2025-26 [1]. That leaves under ₹2 of every ₹100 earned for capital spending. In October 2026 the Cabinet again approved the same 78-day bonus [5]. This shows that staff incentives are now a routine cost rather than a tool for raising efficiency.

Financial pressures on the Operating Ratio

  • Committed staff costs: staff costs (43%) and pensions (22%) make up about 68% of revenue expenditure. These costs jump with every Pay Commission revision [2].
  • Pension under-provisioning: the 2020-21 OR would have been 131.5% if the full pension requirement had been provided for. Low pension provisioning hides how weak the finances really are [2].
  • Passenger cross-subsidy: freight earnings cover the losses on passenger services, and in 2019-20 they were not enough to cover them fully [2].
  • Freight competitiveness: NITI Aayog said high freight tariffs are one reason Railways' share of freight is lower than it should be. This weakens Railways' main source of revenue [2].
  • Recurring payouts: the Productivity-Linked Bonus (PLB) alone costs about ₹2,000 crore a year: ₹2,028.57 crore in 2024 [3] and ₹2,009.61 crore in 2026 [5].

Aligning staff incentives with efficiency

  • Fix the design gap: PLB has stayed at 78 days, capped at ₹17,951 on a ₹7,000 wage ceiling [3]. It works as an entitlement, not as a reward for productivity.
  • Use the built-in review: the scheme, in force since 1979-80, provides for a review every three years in consultation with the recognised federations [4]. This review can be used to rework the formula.
  • Variable, metric-based component: part of the bonus can be tied to zonal and divisional results such as OR, freight loading, punctuality and safety record.
  • Team rewards for frontline staff: loco pilots, trackmen and station staff can be rewarded for asset uptime and accident-free operation.
  • Revenue-sharing: freight business-development teams can get a share of the extra earnings they bring in.
  • Non-monetary levers: promotions linked to appraisals, skill upgradation and recognition.

Proposed incentive cycle:

Efficiency KPIs → Performance audit → Graded bonus → Lower OR → More capex

High fixed costs and an under-provisioned pension bill keep the OR close to 100%. A graded, KPI-linked PLB redesigned with the federations would turn a fixed cost into a driver of efficiency. Aligned incentives can bring the OR down and fund modernisation, in line with SDG 9's call for resilient infrastructure.

Sources

  1. 1PRS Legislative Research – Demand for Grants 2025-26 Analysis: RailwaysOR of 98.9% (2024-25 RE) and 98.43% (2025-26 BE)
  2. 2PRS Legislative Research – Demand for Grants 2022-23 Analysis: Railwaysstaff and pension share of about 68%, Pay Commission jumps, 131.5% OR with full pension provisioning, cross-subsidy, NITI Aayog on freight tariffs
  3. 3PIB – Cabinet approves and announces PLB for 78 days to railway employees (3 Oct 2024)₹2,028.57 crore, 78 days, ₹17,951 cap, ₹7,000 ceiling
  4. 4PIB – Cabinet approves Productivity Linked Bonus for Railway Employeesscheme in force since 1979-80, built with recognised federations, three-yearly review
  5. 5The Hindu – "Railway staff to get bonus equivalent to 78 days' wages" (15 Oct 2026)2026 approval of ₹2,009.61 crore

More from this note