Discuss how the Hub-and-Spoke model and SPV-based governance under PM-SETU address the structural weaknesses of India's vocational training system.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
India now has 13,888 ITIs [5], but these State-run institutes have weak links to employers. PM-SETU is a ₹60,000-crore Centrally Sponsored Scheme that aims to make ITIs "government-owned, industry-managed" [1]. It tackles the system's structural flaws through two design choices.
Structural weaknesses
- Faculty deficit: only 36% of sanctioned instructor posts are filled [6].
- Poor job linkage: only 405 of 4,14,247 trained candidates were recorded as placed, about 0.09% [6].
- Failed earlier PPPs: under the 2007 PPP scheme, industry partners in Uttar Pradesh were chosen without any criteria [7].
- Fragmented quality: institutes work in isolation, with uneven equipment.
Hub-and-Spoke model: fixing scale and quality
- Resource pooling: 200 hubs are linked to about 800 spokes, roughly 1:4 [2]. Costly machinery sits in one hub instead of being bought for every institute.
- Hub services: incubation centres, production units, training-of-trainers facilities and placement services [3] target the faculty and placement gaps.
- Access: spokes extend training to less-served areas within each cluster [3].
- Trainer pipeline: five NSTIs are being upgraded, and 50,000 trainers will be trained [1].
SPV governance: fixing the industry disconnect
- Skin in the game: the Anchor Industry Partner holds 51% of the SPV, and the Centre and State hold 24.5% each [5]. Industry also contributes ₹10,000 crore [1], unlike in the 2007 model.
- Demand-led training: SPVs can propose curriculum redesign, delivery models and industry exposure suited to local needs [4].
- Layered oversight: a National Steering Committee chaired by the Secretary, MSDE, and State Steering Committees monitor progress and correct course [5].
- Fiscal leverage: the World Bank and ADB co-finance half of the Central share [1].
Gaps that persist
- Staffing stays with States: ITIs remain under State control [5], and new labs cannot fill vacant posts.
- Regional skew: ITIs are selected by industrial potential [5], so districts with little industry may be left out.
- Slow execution: 850 ITIs have been identified, but only 14 clusters were approved in the first year [5].
- Accountability: public assets run by a partner with a 51% stake need safeguards.
The hub-and-spoke design addresses scale and quality, while SPV governance makes training relevant to employers. The scheme would work better if funds were released only against published, cluster-wise placement data, and if States recruited instructors alongside the upgrades. Done this way, PM-SETU can advance SDGs 4 and 8 and help India use its demographic dividend.
Sources
- 1Cabinet approves National Scheme for ITI Upgradation and Setting up of Five National Centres of Excellence for Skilling (PIB): outlay and shares, "government-owned, industry-managed", NSTIs, 50,000 trainers, World Bank/ADB co-financing
- 2The Hub and Spoke Model under the PM-SETU (PIB): 200 hubs with about four spokes each
- 3Pradhan Mantri Skilling and Employability Transformation through Upgraded ITIs (PM-SETU) (PIB): hub facilities; spokes extend access
- 4MSDE invites Industry to lead Upgradation of ITIs under PM-SETU Scheme (PIB): SPV powers over curriculum, delivery and industry exposure
- 5PM-SETU: One Year of Transforming India's ITIs (PIB, 3 Oct 2026): number of ITIs, SPV equity, NSC/SSC structure, State control, selection criteria, 850 ITIs and 14 clusters
- 6Transforming Industrial Training Institutes (NITI Aayog, January 2023): 36% instructor posts filled; 0.09% placement
- 7CAG Report on General and Social Sector, Government of Uttar Pradesh (2021): industry partners under the 2007 PPP scheme identified without criteria