·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityS&TIR

Discuss the role of FSSAI in ensuring food safety standards in India. Examine the recent Supreme Court intervention on front-of-pack warning labels in this context.

In this answer
  1. Role of FSSAI in ensuring food safety
  2. Examining the Supreme Court intervention

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), created under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 to lay down science-based standards for food [1], is India's single food regulator. The Supreme Court's ongoing scrutiny of its front-of-pack (FOP) warning-label proposal tests precisely that scientific mandate.

Role of FSSAI in ensuring food safety

  • Standard-setting: the FSS Act, 2006 consolidated eight earlier laws (PFA Act, 1954 and various Control Orders) into one authority under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, ending regulatory multiplicity [1].
  • Rule-making on labelling: the Labelling and Display Regulations prescribe mandatory declarations and warning statements — for instance, supari packs must carry "CHEWING OF SUPARI IS INJURIOUS TO HEALTH" [2].
  • Enforcement: licensing and registration of food businesses, surveillance sampling, and recall powers exercised through State Food Safety Commissioners.
  • Consumer empowerment: the Eat Right India movement promotes safe and healthy eating as preventive health policy [3].

Examining the Supreme Court intervention

  • Acting on a PIL, the Court treated FOP warnings as a matter of public importance, expressly citing concern for children's health [4] — engaging the Article 21 right to health.
  • It earlier criticised FSSAI's reluctance to mandate warnings and asked whether it stemmed from industry pressure, raising the spectre of regulatory capture [4].
  • FSSAI's compliance affidavit (August 2026) then proposed a red hexagonal warning label for foods high in two or more nutrients of concern — added sugar, added saturated fat, salt — with thresholds drawn from the ICMR-NIN Dietary Guidelines for Indians, 2024 [4][5].
  • On 10 September 2026 the Bench of Justices Pardiwala and Vinod Chandran probed the scientific basis of the "high" thresholds [4]. Significantly, the Court reviewed the quality of evidence behind subordinate rule-making rather than substituting its own policy.

Judicial nudging has accelerated a stalled reform, but durable food-safety governance needs FSSAI to institutionalise transparent, ICMR-anchored threshold-setting and strengthen state-level enforcement capacity. A defensible, science-led label — still a proposal, not yet notified — would advance both consumers' right to information and India's SDG-3 commitment on non-communicable diseases.

Sources

  1. 1Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 — FSSAIstatutory basis, science-based standards, consolidation of earlier food laws
  2. 2Food Safety and Standards (Labelling and Display) Regulations — Compendium, FSSAImandatory warning statements including the supari declaration
  3. 3Eat Right India — FSSAIconsumer awareness and preventive nutrition initiative
  4. 4SC seeks clarity on FSSAI's warning label norms — The Hindu, 11 September 2026PIL, Court's remarks on children's health and industry pressure, red hexagonal label affidavit, 10 September 2026 query on thresholds
  5. 5Dietary Guidelines for Indians, 2024 — ICMR-National Institute of Nutritionnutritional thresholds cited as the basis for the proposed labels
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity