·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss the role of state recognition (National Sports Awards) in sustaining excellence in Indian sport, citing examples.

In this answer
  1. Recognition as motivation and material support
  2. Recognition of the wider support system
  3. Limitations

The National Sports Awards — the Major Dhyan Chand Khel Ratna, Arjuna, Dronacharya and Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puraskar, conferred annually by the Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports [2] — are the state's principal instrument for honouring sporting merit. Their contribution to sustaining excellence is real, but works only as one link in a wider ecosystem.

Recognition as motivation and material support

  • Public conferment by the President converts a private career into a national example, giving athletes visibility and sponsorship value.
  • Timing matters: Smriti Mandhana received the Arjuna Award in 2018 [1], mid-career, and went on to cross 10,000 international runs [6] — recognition read as institutional backing, not a farewell honour.
  • The government's enhancement of award prize money [3] raises the material return, which matters most for athletes from modest backgrounds.

Recognition of the wider support system

  • The Dronacharya Award honours coaches and the Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puraskar honours institutions [2], rewarding the ecosystem that produces champions rather than the podium alone.
  • Awards sit at the visible apex of a policy pipeline: Khelo India feeding the Target Olympic Podium Scheme [5], now framed by Khelo Bharat Niti 2025 and its 2036 Olympic ambition [4].
  • Honouring women achievers carries a demonstration effect, widening participation and advancing gender equity in sport.

Limitations

  • Awards are post-facto; they reward excellence already achieved rather than creating grassroots facilities.
  • Recognition skews toward high-visibility sports; for cricketers, international honours such as ICC awards [7] often carry greater career weight than state honours.
  • Periodic disputes over selection criteria and litigation dilute credibility.

State recognition therefore sustains excellence indirectly — by signalling value, rewarding coaches and institutions, and anchoring a talent pipeline. Making criteria transparent and objective, and linking awardees to mentorship roles under Khelo Bharat Niti, would convert honour into a renewable resource for the next generation of athletes.

Sources

  1. 1Shri Kiren Rijiju gave Arjuna Awards to Smriti Mandhana and Rohan Bopanna — PIBMandhana's 2018 Arjuna Award
  2. 2Ministry of Youth Affairs & Sports Announces National Sports Awards 2024 — PIBaward categories, including Dronacharya and Rashtriya Khel Protsahan Puraskar
  3. 3Government has recently enhanced the prize money of National Sports Awards — PIBenhancement of award cash component
  4. 4Khelo Bharat Niti 2025 — PIBnational sports policy framework and 2036 Olympic goal
  5. 5Cabinet approves revamped Khelo India Scheme and enhanced Assistance to National Sports Federations — PIBKhelo India to TOPS pathway
  6. 6India Women seal T20I series 4-0 as Smriti Mandhana completes 10,000 international runs — DD NewsMandhana's 10,000-run landmark
  7. 7Smriti Mandhana named ICC Women's ODI Cricketer of the Year — DD Newsinternational (non-state) recognition mechanisms

More from this note