·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss the significance of the State-Led Model in the implementation of the Amended BharatNet Programme. How does it differ from earlier phases of BharatNet?

In this answer
  1. Significance of the State-Led Model
  2. Departure from earlier phases

Approved by the Union Cabinet in August 2023 and financed through the Digital Bharat Nidhi (successor to the Universal Service Obligation Fund), the Amended BharatNet Programme (ABP) seeks optical-fibre connectivity to about 2.64 lakh Gram Panchayats on ring topology and demand-driven links to roughly 3.8 lakh non-GP villages [3]. Its State-Led Model, now extended to Jharkhand, marks a shift from centralised execution to cooperative delivery.

Significance of the State-Led Model

  • Cooperative federalism in infrastructure: the state government becomes a co-owner of rollout rather than a recipient, as in the Jharkhand agreement among DBN–DoT, the state government, JDICL, BSNL and JCNL [4].
  • State SPVs as delivery vehicles: dedicated companies such as APSFL in Andhra Pradesh or Jharkhand's JCNL leverage local right-of-way clearances, land records and district administration [1].
  • Shared accountability: multi-signatory agreements distribute obligations across Centre, state and PSU, addressing the execution delays and idle-fibre problem of earlier phases.
  • Convergence with state e-governance: fibre integrates with state data networks, CSCs and DBT delivery — critical in Jharkhand's tribal and LWE-affected blocks, where connectivity underpins telemedicine, e-education and welfare access.
  • Operational continuity: the model funds not merely laying fibre but ten-year operation and maintenance, correcting the "build-and-abandon" weakness [3].

Departure from earlier phases

  • Phase-I relied largely on central agencies (BBNL/BSNL) with states as passive beneficiaries; Phase-II under this model makes eight states — Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, Telangana — implementing partners [3].
  • Funding now flows through the statutory Digital Bharat Nidhi under the Telecommunications Act, 2023, not the erstwhile USOF.
  • Technology upgrade: ring topology with MPLS replaces vulnerable point-to-point links, improving redundancy [3].
  • Emphasis shifts from kilometres of fibre laid to usable last-mile bandwidth, with Gujarat's operationalisation demonstrating the template [2].

Rural broadband is today an enabler of rights — to education, health and entitlements. If states sustain utilisation alongside creation, the State-Led Model can convert BharatNet from a connectivity project into the backbone of inclusive digital governance envisaged under Digital India.

Sources

  1. 1Agreement between DBN–DoT, Government of Andhra Pradesh, APBIL, BSNL & APSFL for Implementation of ABP in Andhra Pradesh, PIBmulti-party state-led agreement structure and role of state SPVs
  2. 2Amended BharatNet Program Operationalises in Gujarat under State-Led Model, PIBstate-led operationalisation template
  3. 3BharatNet: Bridging the Digital Divide, PIBAugust 2023 Cabinet approval, 2.64 lakh GPs on ring topology with MPLS, 3.8 lakh non-GP villages, DBOM with ten-year O&M, eight State-Led Model states
  4. 4Agreement Signed between DBN, Government of Jharkhand, JDICL, BSNL & JCNL for Implementation of the Amended BharatNet Programme in Jharkhand, PIBJharkhand signatories under the State-Led Model *(exact release page not reachable for verification; official PIB domain linked)*

More from this note