·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Discuss how urban mining of spent batteries can reduce India's import dependence on critical minerals. What policy gaps remain?

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. How urban mining reduces import dependence
  2. Policy gaps that remain

Urban mining means recovering metals from products that have been thrown away. Spent lithium-ion batteries contain lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese, which are critical minerals that India mostly imports. As more people use EVs, battery waste can become a domestic "mine", but only if India fixes how batteries are collected and priced.

How urban mining reduces import dependence

  • Domestic secondary supply: about 36 kT of Li-ion batteries reached end-of-life in 2025 [1]. Metals recovered from them can go straight into cell manufacturing, so India relies less on concentrated foreign supply chains.
  • Ready processing base: announced recycling capacity was over 80 kT, against only about 15 kT of supply in 2025 [1]. Plants can take in much more feedstock.
  • Regulatory push: the Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022 make producers, including importers, responsible for collection and recycling under EPR. Producers meet this through tradable certificates on a central portal [2].
  • Feedstock retention: on 10 November 2026, DGFT moved black mass (shredded battery powder) from the "Free" to the "Prohibited" export list [3]. This keeps the minerals for Indian refiners.
  • Value capture: refining at home means India does not export black mass and then buy back the same metals at a higher price.

Policy gaps that remain

  • Collection leakage: of the 36 kT, informal dealers collected about 18 kT and formal channels only 5.04 kT [1]. The minerals are lost before shredding even begins.
  • Weak EPR compliance: producers bought certificates for 7.29 lakh MT of battery metals against a target of 10.96 lakh MT [4]. This leaves a one-third shortfall in demand for recycling.
  • Chemistry-blind targets: EPR treats low-value LFP batteries the same as nickel-cobalt ones. NITI Aayog says recycling LFP does not pay [1], so these batteries risk ending up in landfills.
  • Price gap: the export ban redirects supply. But it cannot create demand if Indian refiners pay less than foreign buyers did.
  • Fragmented governance: trade policy (DGFT), waste rules (MoEFCC/CPCB) and mineral policy (Mines Ministry) are handled separately.

Urban mining can turn India's growing battery waste into a strategic mineral reserve. But secure supply depends on collection and on making recycling pay, not on trade controls alone. NITI Aayog's suggestions show the way forward: EPR pricing set by chemistry, linking the EPR portal with GSTN, and incentives under the National Critical Mineral Mission [1]. Together they would advance mineral self-reliance and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production).

Sources

  1. 1NITI Aayog, *Advancing Circular Economy of Waste Electronic and Electrical Equipment (E-waste) and Lithium-Ion Batteries in India* (January 2026): end-of-life volumes, informal vs formal collection, capacity vs supply, LFP viability, chemistry-specific EPR pricing, GSTN linkage, NCMM incentives
  2. 2PIB (MoEFCC), Government notifies Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022: EPR on producers including importers, centralised EPR certificate portal
  3. 3DGFT Notification amending export policy for lithium-ion battery black mass, "Free" to "Prohibited" (10 November 2026): black-mass export ban
  4. 4PIB, Parliament reply on EPR under the Battery Waste Management Rules: EPR certificates of 7.29 lakh MT against a target of 10.96 lakh MT

More from this note