·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Doubling the modal share of coastal and inland water transport is central to India's logistics and climate goals. Examine the constraints and the policy measures needed.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Why the shift matters
  2. Constraints
  3. Policy measures needed

Coastal shipping and inland waterways together carry only about 6% of India's freight. The Coastal Cargo Promotion Scheme (Budget 2026-27) aims to double this to 12% by 2047 [1]. The shift can cut logistics costs and emissions together, but only if structural constraints are fixed.

Why the shift matters

  • Fuel efficiency: one litre of fuel moves 215 tonne-km by inland water, 95 by rail and 24 by road [4]. The expected saving is 16 MMT of CO₂ [1].
  • Momentum: coastal cargo grew from 74 to 177 MMT in 12 years [1].

Constraints

  • Navigability: barges need a Least Available Depth of 2 m to operate profitably [3]. Monsoon-fed rivers run shallow in the dry season, so they need dredging every year and vessels sail part-loaded.
  • Thin cost edge: RITES figures cited by NITI Aayog put inland water at ₹1.06 per tonne-km against ₹1.36 for rail [4]. Loading, unloading and trucking at the first and last mile wipe out this small gap.
  • Concentration and connectivity: inland waterways carry only about 2% of freight, and 5 National Waterways handle 80% of that cargo. The Standing Committee also flagged poor links to the hinterland and high vessel costs [2].
  • Ecology: dredging on NW-1 disturbed Gangetic dolphin habitat [2].
  • Vague metric: the target does not say whether it is measured in tonnes or tonne-km, and it gives no separate coastal and inland baselines [1].

Policy measures needed

  • Statutory clarity: the Coastal Shipping Act, 2025 requires a National Coastal and Inland Shipping Strategic Plan, revised every two years [6]. That plan should fix the metric and set separate coastal and inland targets.
  • Develop deep corridors first: prioritise waterways with at least 2 m of natural depth [3] and bulk corridors such as NW-5, which links Talcher–Angul to Paradip and Dhamra [7]. Run environmental studies before development [2].
  • Outcome-linked subsidies: Jalvahak pays back up to 35% of operating costs on NW-1, NW-2 and NW-16 [5]. The new scheme should reward fixed-day scheduled services and check results against Jalvahak's 800 million tonne-km goal before scaling up.
  • Terminals plus first/last mile: pair incentives with terminal upgrades [2] and road–rail feeder links under PM Gati Shakti.

Water transport works best on coastal routes and bulk-mineral corridors; it cannot replace rail everywhere. Depth-first planning, outcome-linked incentives and integrated multimodal links can make the 12% goal realistic. That would advance Maritime Amrit Kaal Vision 2047 [6] and India's commitments under SDG-9 and SDG-13.

Sources

  1. 1PIB – MoPSW Consultative Committee meeting, Puri (Nov 2026)6%→12% target, Coastal Cargo Promotion Scheme, 16 MMT CO₂, coastal cargo 74→177 MMT
  2. 2PRS – Standing Committee Report Summary: Development and Expansion of Existing and New National Inland Waterways (2023)~2% share, 5 NWs carry 80% of cargo, hinterland and vessel-cost barriers, dolphin impact, terminal upgrades
  3. 3Standing Committee Report on the National Waterways Bill, 20152 m Least Available Depth, prioritising deep waterways
  4. 4NITI Aayog – Efficiency and Competitiveness of Indian Railways (freight study)RITES cost and fuel-efficiency comparison across modes
  5. 5PIB – Govt Unveils 'Jalvahak' to Boost Inland Waterways35% reimbursement, NW-1/2/16, 800 million tonne-km goal
  6. 6PIB – Maritime India: From Vision 2030 to Amrit Kaal 2047 (Oct 2025)Coastal Shipping Act, 2025 strategic plan; Amrit Kaal Vision 2047
  7. 7PIB – A Ride through the Inland Waterways of India (Apr 2026)NW-5 linking Talcher–Angul with Paradip and Dhamra

More from this note