Drug trafficking from the Golden Crescent poses an internal security threat that transcends law-and-order into dimensions of geopolitics and public health. Discuss the multi-pronged response needed.
In this answer
Heroin originating in the Golden Crescent (Afghanistan–Pakistan–Iran) enters India largely overland through Punjab, making narcotics not merely a policing problem but a composite threat spanning border security, foreign policy and population health — and requiring an equally layered response.
Internal security dimension
- Trafficking proceeds finance organised crime and narco-terror networks, with drones and cross-border tunnels emerging as delivery vectors [1].
- Enforcement selectivity blunts deterrence: in May 2026 the Supreme Court criticised Punjab for arresting only small peddlers while "bigger sharks" remain untouched, despite the State's near-89% NDPS conviction rate [4].
- Trade has migrated to darknet marketplaces and cryptocurrency, prompting a dedicated task force under the Multi Agency Centre [2].
Geopolitical dimension
- Punjab's location on the Afghanistan–Pakistan supply corridor ties drug interdiction directly to border management; BSF, SSB, Assam Rifles and the Indian Coast Guard are empowered under the NDPS Act, 1985 for search, seizure and arrest [1].
- Source-country instability makes bilateral and UNODC-led cooperation indispensable, since domestic seizure alone cannot cut supply [1].
Public health dimension
- Addiction concentrated among rural youth erodes the right to life with dignity under Article 21, feeding crime, indebtedness and family breakdown.
- Treatment capacity is addressed through the NAPDDR (2018–25) and Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaan, running in 372 vulnerable districts via de-addiction and rehabilitation centres [3].
The multi-pronged response needed
- Supply-side: target kingpins through financial investigation under PMLA and preventive detention under PITNDPS; strengthen institutional depth — NCB's Amritsar unit upgraded to a Zonal Unit [5], with a dedicated ANTF in each State [2].
- Coordination: make the 4-tier NCORD mechanism operationally effective from national to district level [1].
- Demand-side: integrate de-addiction with primary healthcare, school counselling and youth employment [3].
Sustained progress requires shifting the metric of success from arrest numbers to networks dismantled and addicts rehabilitated. A response combining hard interdiction, health-led demand reduction and regional diplomacy — consistent with SDG 3.5 — can convert episodic crackdowns into durable security.
Sources
- 1PIB — Strengthening NDPS Act and Tackling Cross-Border Drug Trafficking4-tier NCORD, ANTF at ADG/IG level, border forces and Coast Guard empowered under NDPS Act
- 2PIB — Seizure of Narcotics in PunjabPunjab ANTF headed by Special DGP; darknet and cryptocurrency task force under Multi Agency Centre; PITNDPS advisory board
- 3PIB — National Action Plan for Drug Demand Reduction (NAPDDR) and Nasha Mukt Bharat Abhiyaandemand-reduction plan; NMBA in 372 vulnerable districts; de-addiction and rehabilitation facilities
- 4"SC criticises Punjab govt. over drug menace" — The Hindu, 9 May 2026 *(link not verifiable at time of writing)* — Supreme Court's observation that only small peddlers are arrested
- 5PIB — NCB Offices in PunjabAmritsar Sub-Zonal Unit upgraded to Zonal Unit, now fully operational
Practice
5 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.