·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsIR

Evaluate India's role as BRICS Chair (2026) in shaping the grouping's stance on multilateral trade institutions.

In this answer
  1. Achievements in shaping the bloc's stance
  2. Limitations

India chaired BRICS in 2026 under the theme "Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability," culminating in the New Delhi Declaration (12–13 September 2026) [1]. Its chairship gave the bloc a sharper, development-anchored position on the WTO and Bretton Woods institutions, though the gains remain declaratory rather than enforceable.

Achievements in shaping the bloc's stance

  • Agenda-setting through process: a dense calendar of ministerial and working-group engagements under India's chairship, including the 16th BRICS Trade Ministers' Meeting at Jaipur, built the consensus later codified in the Declaration [3].
  • Sharpened WTO reform demand: the Declaration seeks a rules-based multilateral trading system with the WTO at its core and, crucially, immediate restoration of a two-tier binding dispute settlement mechanism with new Appellate Body appointments [1].
  • Development-first framing: India converted MSMEs into a trade-governance issue — the inaugural BRICS MSME Forum and Third SME Working Group Meeting at Agra (June 2026) fed into Declaration language on credit assessment for export-oriented MSMEs and their integration into global value chains [2][1].
  • Defence of policy space: continuity from the Rio Declaration on unilateral tariff and non-tariff measures, coercive measures, and protectionism pursued under environmental objectives (e.g., carbon border taxes) [1].
  • Inclusive multilateralism: support for Ethiopia's and Iran's WTO accession and for IMF/World Bank reform toward greater representation [1].

Limitations

  • The Declaration is a consensus political document, not a treaty — implementation rests on voluntary working-group coordination without enforcement [1].
  • Restoring the Appellate Body needs consent from members outside BRICS; the bloc's leverage is persuasive, not decisive.
  • An enlarged membership risks lowest-common-denominator outcomes, while several members maintain their own trade restrictions, inviting questions of consistency.
  • Chairship rotates to China in 2027, creating continuity risk for India's MSME-centred priorities.

On balance, India's chairship was a credible agenda-shaping success: it moved BRICS from grievance to a reform blueprint with a concrete MSME deliverable. Sustaining it requires institutionalising the SME Working Group's outcomes and coalition-building with the wider Global South at the WTO, so that the New Delhi Declaration's reform vocabulary translates into negotiated multilateral gains.

Sources

  1. 1BRICS New Delhi Declaration: Building for Resilience, Innovation, Cooperation and Sustainability (12 September 2026) — Prime Minister of Indiasummit theme and dates; WTO reform and two-tier dispute settlement demand; MSME and export credit language; unilateral tariff, non-tariff and coercive measures; Ethiopia and Iran WTO accession; IMF/World Bank reform; declaration's non-binding character
  2. 2Ministry of MSME Successfully Hosted First BRICS MSME Forum and Third SME Working Group Meeting in Agra — PIBinaugural BRICS MSME Forum and SME Working Group outcomes on MSME finance and competitiveness
  3. 3India concludes the 16th BRICS Trade Ministers' Meeting in Jaipur under its BRICS Chairship 2026 — PIBministerial-track engagements building consensus under India's chairship
  4. 4BRICS India 2026 — Ministry of External AffairsIndia's 2026 chairship and annual rotation of the chair
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on IR