Evaluate PM-KUSUM's role in turning *Annadata* into *Urjadata*. What design changes should a dedicated Agri-PV component include?
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
PM-KUSUM (2019) aims to make farmers Urjadata (energy-givers) by letting them set up solar plants of up to 2 MW on their own land. On cultivated fields, panels must be mounted on stilts [2]. The scheme has done well at solarising irrigation but much less well at turning farmers into power producers.
Achievements
- Reach: the scheme had over 20 lakh beneficiaries by late 2025 [1].
- Second income: farmers who lease land for solar plants can earn up to ₹80,000/ha a year [1]. In ministry-cited cases, crop and power income together rose from about ₹60,000 to over ₹1 lakh per acre [7].
- Credit access: the scheme is covered by the Agriculture Infrastructure Fund, which offers interest subvention [6].
Limitations
- Farmer-owned plants lag: Component A built only 641 MW against a 10,000 MW target by July 2025 [3]. That is about 6% of target, compared with 60% for stand-alone pumps [4].
- No subsidy, costly land conversion: the Estimates Committee named the lack of central financial assistance and costly land-use conversion as the main barriers [3].
- Groundwater risk: solar pumping costs almost nothing per extra hour, so farmers tend to over-extract. Grid-connected designs, where farmers can sell surplus power, give them a reason to save water [5].
- Height, not harvest: the only design rule is that panels are raised and rows spaced apart [2]. Nothing checks how much crop is grown underneath.
Verdict: the pump components have worked, but the Urjadata goal is still largely unmet.
Design changes for the Agri-PV component The proposed 10 GW Agri-PV component of PM-KUSUM 2.0 [7] should include:
- Central financial assistance for small plants, as the Estimates Committee recommended [3], combined with AIF loans [6].
- Agricultural status kept: States should exempt certified Agri-PV plots from land-use conversion.
- Minimum crop yield: subsidy paid only if the field keeps a fixed share of its normal yield. ICAR should set this share for each agro-climatic zone, using the crop-impact study the Committee asked for [3].
- Water safeguard: prefer grid-connected designs in over-exploited groundwater blocks [5].
- Pooling through FPOs and cooperatives, which the scheme already allows [2], so that smallholders can combine their land.
PM-KUSUM has built the base for solar power on farms. Making farmers Urjadata now needs financing, land rules and a yield safeguard designed for farmer-owned plants. A redesigned Agri-PV component would let farmers earn from both crops and power, and advance SDG 2 and SDG 7 together.
Sources
- 1PM-KUSUM Empowers Farmers as 'Urjadata', Reaching Over 20 Lakh Beneficiaries (PIB, Dec 2025)20 lakh+ beneficiaries; lease income up to ₹80,000/ha/yr
- 2PM-KUSUM Frequently Asked Questions (MNRE)Component A plant size, stilt-mounted panels with row spacing, FPO/cooperative eligibility
- 3Implementation of PM-KUSUM and PM Surya Ghar: Estimates Committee report summary (PRS, Dec 2025)641 MW vs 10,000 MW; no central assistance and land-conversion cost as barriers; central assistance for small projects; crop-impact study
- 4Performance Evaluation of Solar Power Projects in the Country: Standing Committee on Energy report summary (PRS)Component A at ~6% of target, pumps at 60%
- 5NITI Aayog & World Bank: Energy-Water-Agriculture Nexus – Grow Solar, Save Water, Double the Farm Incomegrid-connected solar irrigation as a way to save water and raise farm income
- 6Rajya Sabha Unstarred Question on PM-KUSUM, 4 Feb 2025PM-KUSUM covered under the Agriculture Infrastructure Fund
- 7Agri-Renewable Energy Helping Farmers Access Reliable Power, Increase Productivity and Reduce Irrigation Costs: Pralhad Joshi (PIB)proposed 10 GW Agri-PV component in PM-KUSUM 2.0; ₹60,000 to ₹1 lakh+ per acre income