·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Evaluate the role of BRICS in international tax cooperation.

In this answer
  1. Contributions
  2. Limitations

The BRICS Heads of Tax Authorities (HoTA) forum, supported by a tax-experts track and a Young Tax Professionals (YTP) working group, is the grouping's platform for tax-administration cooperation, now running under India's fourth BRICS Chairship (from January 2026). Its worth lies less in making rules than in building bargaining power inside global tax forums.

Contributions

  • Administrative cooperation below the political level: the 2021 HoTA meeting under India's chairship addressed digitalisation of tax administration, use of technology against evasion, and the shift from enforcement to taxpayer service [1] — cooperation needing no treaty.
  • Capacity building where the real gap lies: the YTP workshop at NADT, Nagpur (April 2026) trained officers from BRICS and partner states in BEPS, Pillar One/Two and transfer pricing [2]. This matters because developing countries received data on about 40 million financial accounts worth EUR 2.7 trillion under automatic exchange, yet 43 have not fixed a date for their first exchange [3].
  • Collective bargaining: with the UN Framework Convention on International Tax Cooperation (terms of reference adopted August 2024) giving every state an equal vote [4], a common BRICS line carries real weight.
  • Defending source-country rights: joint adoption of the Subject to Tax Rule, which lets developing countries tax intra-group payments taxed abroad below a 9% nominal rate [5].

Limitations

  • BRICS has no treaty, secretariat or dispute mechanism — HoTA ends in a communiqué, not an enforceable rule.
  • The binding rules are written elsewhere: the 15% GloBE minimum effective rate emerged from the OECD/G20 process [6].
  • Divergent interests — capital-exporting China versus source economies like India and South Africa — and enlargement make consensus harder.
  • Domestically, Indian incentives pushing effective rates below 15% merely surrender revenue as top-up tax abroad [6].

BRICS is therefore a coordination forum, not a law-making one — judged rightly by whether members vote together, not by declarations issued. India's chairship should convert it into a joint STTR push, open NADT training to African and South Asian officers, and carry an agreed BRICS position into the UN talks before the text closes — advancing the equitable global governance that SDG-17 envisages.

Sources

  1. 1Meeting of BRICS Heads of Tax Authorities and Experts on Tax Matters held virtually under Chairship of India, PIB (2021)2021 HoTA agenda on digitalisation and tax administration
  2. 2Capacity Building Workshop for BRICS Young Tax Professionals Begins at NADT Nagpur, PIB (2026)YTP workshop, venue and curriculum
  3. 32025 Global Forum Capacity Building Report, OECDaccounts and value exchanged with developing countries; readiness gap
  4. 4International tax cooperation: advancing equality and sustainable development, UN DESAUN Framework Convention and equal-voice rationale
  5. 5New treaty advances Pillar Two Subject to Tax Rule designed to protect tax bases in developing countries, OECD (2024)STTR and the 9% nominal-rate threshold
  6. 6Tax Incentives and the Global Minimum Corporate Tax, OECD15% GloBE floor and top-up tax on sub-15% incentives

More from this note