·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Examine the causes of time and cost overruns in infrastructure projects in India, with reference to land acquisition, environmental clearances, and inter-agency coordination.

In this answer
  1. Land acquisition delays
  2. Environmental and forest clearances
  3. Weak inter-agency coordination

MoSPI monitors all central-sector infrastructure projects costing ₹150 crore and above, and its Flash Report for July 2026 showed 1,775 ongoing projects across 17 ministries carrying a cumulative cost overrun of ₹3,40,504 crore — revised cost rising to ₹37.11 lakh crore against an original ₹33.70 lakh crore [1][2]. Such overruns are less a financing failure than a failure of pre-project preparation and coordination.

Land acquisition delays

  • The RFCTLARR Act, 2013 mandates a Social Impact Assessment, consent of 80% of affected families for private projects, and rehabilitation before possession — procedurally sound but time-consuming [3].
  • Compensation at four times market value in rural areas raises project cost mid-execution; litigation over awards further stalls right-of-way handover [3].
  • Linear projects (highways, rail) need contiguous land across many landowners, so a single disputed stretch idles the whole contract.

Environmental and forest clearances

  • Projects require separate Environment, Forest, Wildlife and CRZ clearances, historically pursued through disjointed processes; PARIVESH, launched in 2018, was created precisely to compress these into a single window [4].
  • Sequential appraisal by expert committees, public hearings and compliance conditions extend gestation, while delayed starts push costs up through price escalation.

Weak inter-agency coordination

  • Utility shifting, municipal permissions and state clearances involve agencies outside the implementing ministry, with no single accountable authority.
  • PM Gati Shakti (2021) now integrates 44 central ministries and 36 States/UTs on a geospatial platform, with an Empowered Group of Secretaries and Network Planning Group to resolve inter-ministerial issues [5].
  • MoSPI's own monitoring remains administrative and self-reported, without penalty for slippage [2].

Overruns thus arise from optimistic ex-ante estimation colliding with land, environmental and jurisdictional realities. The remedy lies in securing land and clearances before awarding contracts, strengthening Gati Shakti-based joint planning, and publishing project-wise accountability data — converting monitoring into genuine delivery, as India's capital-expenditure push demands.

Sources

  1. 1MoSPI Flash Report on Central Sector Infrastructure Projects worth ₹150 crore and above — PAIMANA portalJuly 2026 figures: 1,775 projects, ₹37.11 lakh crore revised cost
  2. 2Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI)₹150 crore monitoring threshold; monthly Flash Report mechanism and cost-overrun aggregate
  3. 3PRS Legislative Research — The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill, 2013Social Impact Assessment, 80% consent, four-times compensation
  4. 4PIB — "PARIVESH": environmental single window hub for Environment, Forest, Wildlife and CRZ clearancesmultiple clearance streams and single-window reform
  5. 5PIB — PM GatiShakti National Master Plan completes 3 years44 ministries and 36 States/UTs integrated; EGoS and Network Planning Group

More from this note