·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Examine the challenges that technology, such as drones and digital platforms, poses to border management and internal security. Suggest counter-measures.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Challenges to Border Management
  2. Challenges to Internal Security
  3. Counter-measures

Technology has turned India's western frontier from a land border into a three-dimensional one. The MoD Year-End Review 2025 recorded 782 drone incidents along the Punjab–Rajasthan border [2]. Drones and digital platforms let smugglers, gangsters and terror handlers operate without crossing the fence. The response therefore has to be led by technology just as much.

Challenges to Border Management

  • Aerial bypass: drones fly over fencing, floodlights and patrols. Of the 237 drones brought down on the IB in 2025, 72 carried narcotics [2].
  • Narco-terror convergence: 5 of the downed drones carried war-like stores [2]. MHA has linked drone recoveries on the Punjab border to both arms and narcotics smuggling [3].
  • Detection gaps: small, low-flying drones are hard to track at night. 161 of the downed drones had no payload [2], which suggests loads were dropped before interception or the flights were testing defences.

Challenges to Internal Security

  • Digital platforms: encrypted apps and social media let handlers abroad fix drop points, recruit couriers and issue threats. This makes attribution and evidence collection across jurisdictions difficult.
  • Crime–terror financing: drug money from cross-border drops funds gangster networks that work across states.
  • Fragmented enforcement: BSF's NDPS search-seizure-arrest powers apply at the border [1], while inland follow-up rests with state police. As a result, a drone sighted at the IB is rarely traced to the gang that collects the drop.

Counter-measures

  • Layered anti-drone grid: expand the anti-drone systems deployed in Punjab's border areas [1]. Add state-level second lines such as Punjab's 'Baaj Akh' system, being deployed from Pathankot to Fazilka [5].
  • Integrated intelligence: share data in real time among BSF, DRI, Customs and the state Anti-Narcotics Task Force through platforms like SMAC and LIA [4]. Set up joint BSF–ANTF cells to follow drops inland.
  • Smart borders: use vulnerability mapping of the border [4], CIBMS-style sensor fencing, and drone forensics to trace launch points.
  • Platform accountability: block gang content under Section 69A, IT Act, enforce due-diligence duties under the IT Rules, 2021, and build cyber-forensic capacity.
  • Diplomatic pressure: raise cross-border drone use bilaterally and in terror-financing forums.

Technology has moved the threat from the fence to the sky and the smartphone. A "smart border" that combines anti-drone shields, unified intelligence and accountable platforms can restore deterrence. It must rest on cooperative federalism between the BSF and state police. This would serve SDG 16 (peace, justice and strong institutions) and secure both the frontier and the hinterland.

Sources

  1. 1PIB – Government has taken various steps to tackle drug smuggling at the border areas (MHA, 2023)anti-drone systems in Punjab border areas; BSF powers under the NDPS Act at the IB
  2. 2PIB – Ministry of Defence Year End Review 2025782 drone incidents; 237 drones brought down (72 narcotics, 5 war-like stores, 161 no payload)
  3. 3MHA – Lok Sabha Unstarred Question No. 4460, 28 March 2023drone recoveries on the Punjab border linked to arms and narcotics smuggling
  4. 4Rajya Sabha – Unstarred Question No. 1017, answered 31 July 2024ANTF under a Special DGP; intelligence sharing via LIA/SMAC; border vulnerability mapping
  5. 5All India Radio News – Punjab launches 'Baaj Akh' anti-drone system to curb cross-border drug smuggling (Aug 2025)Baaj Akh anti-drone system from Tarn Taran, deployed Pathankot–Fazilka

More from this note