·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Examine how competitive, outcome-based execution models like 'Challenge Mode' can address chronic delays in India's infrastructure projects. Illustrate with reference to the Modified UDAN scheme.

In this answer
  1. How competitive execution attacks delay
  2. Limits the model does not cover

Chronic time and cost overruns dog Indian infrastructure: of 13 approved greenfield airports, four became operational only after 10 years and one after 20 [3]. 'Challenge Mode', introduced under the Modified UDAN scheme (approved March 2026, outlay ₹28,840 crore) [1], replaces sequential, allotment-based rollout with states competing on fixed benchmarks — a shift worth examining on both promise and limits.

How competitive execution attacks delay

  • Incentive redesign: under sequential rollout a slow state lost nothing; competitive ranking makes early land handover and quick commencement a source of advantage, addressing the root cause — land acquisition and resettlement disputes [3].
  • Outcome-based benchmarks: scoring on timely completion, quality, innovation and sustainability shifts scheme design from inputs released to results delivered.
  • Cooperative federalism: MoUs signed with states convert the state from bystander to accountable partner — essential, since land is a state subject while funding is central.
  • Capital efficiency: the Ministry targets completion in 18 months against roughly three years earlier, unlocking regional trade, tourism and cargo sooner. Using existing unserved airstrips rather than greenfield land further compresses timelines [2].

Limits the model does not cover

  • The clock runs only from commencement; the longest delays occur before it, in acquisition and litigation — which is why the Standing Committee sought a land-acquisition tracking mechanism [3].
  • Benchmarks reward construction, not usage. Less than 40% of routes awarded under RCS-UDAN had been operationalised [4], and routes discontinued before their three-year tenure had to be re-bid under UDAN Round 5.3 [5].
  • O&M support lasts only three years (₹3.06 crore per airport annually) [2]; thereafter recurring security and fire costs fall on states.

Challenge Mode is therefore a genuine fix for the delivery stage, not the whole project cycle. Pairing it with a published greenfield–brownfield policy, a public land-acquisition tracker [3] and the Committee's recommended two-year extension of airline support [4] would convert speed of construction into durable connectivity — advancing balanced regional development under the Viksit Bharat vision.

Sources

  1. 1Cabinet approves Regional Connectivity Scheme – Modified UDAN with a total outlay of Rs.28,840 crore (PMO/PIB)Cabinet approval, outlay, scheme framework
  2. 2Modified UDAN: Strengthening India's Regional Aviation Network, PIB (17 July 2026)100 airports from unserved airstrips; O&M support of ₹3.06 crore per annum per airport for three years
  3. 3Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture — Development of Greenfield and Brownfield Airports and Civil Enclaves in Defence Airports (2023), PRS summarygreenfield delays of 10–20 years; land-acquisition tracking mechanism; absence of greenfield–brownfield policy
  4. 4Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture — Status of Aviation Connectivity in the Country (2021), PRS summaryunder 40% of awarded RCS-UDAN routes operationalised; recommendation to extend airline benefits by two years
  5. 5UDAN Round 5.3 Reopens Bidding for Discontinued Routes before completion of 3-year tenure, PIBre-bidding of routes discontinued before tenure completion

More from this note