·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Examine why 'multi-alignment' may be inadequate for India's security interests in a changing West Asia.

In this answer
  1. A changed regional order narrows the neutral space
  2. Security stakes now exceed what diplomacy alone can insure
  3. Competing commitments are already forcing choices

'Multi-alignment' — simultaneously deepening ties with Riyadh, Tehran, Tel Aviv and Abu Dhabi without binding security commitments — suited an era when West Asia was largely India's economic hinterland. As the region turns into an active conflict theatre, this hedging is increasingly inadequate for India's hard security needs.

A changed regional order narrows the neutral space

  • Post-Abraham Accords realignment and open Israel–Iran–US hostilities have polarised the region; India's partners are now adversaries in live conflict, shrinking the ambiguity multi-alignment depends on.
  • Crisis management has become recurrent rather than exceptional, requiring inter-ministerial coordination on West Asian contingencies [1] — reactive machinery, not a security doctrine.

Security stakes now exceed what diplomacy alone can insure

  • Energy security: nearly 70% of crude and 85% of natural gas imports come from the region, exposing India to the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint despite diversification of routes [1].
  • Diaspora: about one crore Indians in the GCC, remitting over $35 billion annually, create a standing evacuation and welfare liability [2].
  • Maritime commerce: sea lanes carrying this trade need protection; IMEC is officially framed as adding to India's maritime security [3], but corridors require escort and surveillance capability, not goodwill.
  • Crucially, hedging generates no obligation of assistance — no partner is bound to secure Indian shipping or citizens in a crisis.

Competing commitments are already forcing choices

  • India's 10-year Shahid Beheshti terminal contract at Chabahar (2024) with Iran [4] coexists uneasily with I2U2 cooperation alongside Israel and the US [5]; sanctions and conflict can hold such assets hostage.

Multi-alignment remains a sound diplomatic posture but an insufficient security one. India should convert breadth into depth — logistics and defence-cooperation agreements, joint exercises, maritime domain awareness and coordinated evacuation frameworks — using I2U2 and IMEC as platforms. Structured partnerships, pursued without alliance entanglement, would strengthen rather than surrender India's strategic autonomy.

Sources

  1. 1Inter-Ministerial Briefing on Recent Developments in West Asia, PIB70% crude and 85% gas import dependence on West Asia; Hormuz route exposure; crisis coordination
  2. 2India and Gulf Cooperation Council, Ministry of External Affairs~10 million Indian diaspora in GCC and over $35 billion in annual remittances
  3. 3IMEC initiative to add to India's maritime security: Shri Piyush Goyal, PIBIMEC's maritime security dimension
  4. 4Long-term Main Contract for Shahid Beheshti Port Terminal, Chabahar, PIB10-year India–Iran Chabahar contract signed 13 May 2024
  5. 5Joint Statement of the Leaders of India, Israel, UAE and the United States (I2U2), MEAI2U2 minilateral cooperation with Israel and the US

More from this note