·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityS&TIR

Examine the role of institutions like AMTZ in reducing India's dependence on imported medical technology.

In this answer
  1. How such institutions cut import dependence
  2. Limits to the model

India has historically met roughly 80% of its medical device demand by value through imports, a dependence the Cabinet flagged while approving the National Medical Devices Policy, 2023 [1]. Institutions like the Andhra Pradesh MedTech Zone (AMTZ), Visakhapatnam — a State-promoted park, not a ministry — address this by building shared ecosystems rather than isolated factories.

How such institutions cut import dependence

  • Lowering entry barriers: AMTZ offers common scientific facilities (electromagnetic, radiation, biomaterial testing) that no single start-up could afford, hosting 100+ manufacturing units in one integrated hub [2].
  • Import substitution in practice: with DBT support, AMTZ indigenised testing kits and reagents that were earlier imported, and the DBT–AMTZ COMManD consortium and mobile I-Lab met critical COVID-era equipment shortages [2].
  • Regulatory and standards handholding: the Kalam Institute of Health Technology (KIHT) anchors the MedTech Mitra initiative with CDSCO, BIS, ICMR and NITI Aayog, and partnered the Indian Pharmacopoeia Commission on materiovigilance — easing the certification bottleneck that pushes hospitals toward trusted imports [3].
  • Innovation-to-industry linkage: as the Vizag S&T Cluster, AMTZ hosted the 3rd All S&T Clusters' Meet (September 2025), connecting academia, industry and start-ups for research translation [4].
  • Scale through diplomacy: the BRICS BioDesign Programme, launched with the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser and FICCI, extends need-driven co-development and market access across the Global South [5].

Limits to the model

  • High-end imaging, implants and critical components/raw materials remain imported, so assembly-level localisation can mask continued dependence.
  • Domestic R&D intensity is low; incentives like the PLI scheme for medical devices (₹3,420 crore) still carry the heavier burden of capacity creation [6].
  • A few flagship zones cannot substitute for a dispersed national supplier base.

Thus, AMTZ-type institutions are enablers rather than substitutes for policy. Their real value lies in de-risking innovation and compressing the idea-to-market cycle; scaling this cluster model alongside the Medical Devices Policy, 2023 can convert Atmanirbharta in health technology into affordable care for citizens.

Sources

  1. 1Cabinet approves the Policy for the Medical Devices Sector, PIB (2023)import dependence in medical devices; National Medical Devices Policy, 2023
  2. 2Indigenous Manufacturing of Medical Equipments, PIBAMTZ integrated hub, common facilities, 100+ units, DBT–AMTZ COMManD, indigenised kits and reagents
  3. 3IPC and AMTZ National Meet on Pharmacovigilance and Materiovigilance, PIBKIHT, MedTech Mitra and regulatory/standards support
  4. 4Principal Scientific Adviser Chairs the 3rd All S&T Clusters' Meet, Vishakhapatnam, PIB (2025)Vizag S&T Cluster hosted by AMTZ; academia–industry–start-up linkage
  5. 5A.P. MedTech Zone to drive BRICS BioDesign initiative, The Hindu (13 September 2026)BRICS BioDesign Programme with PSA Office and FICCI; Global South focus
  6. 6Progress and implementation of the PLI scheme for medical devices, PIBPLI outlay of ₹3,420 crore for domestic medical device manufacturing
Practice
10 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity