·PIB·15 marks·250–350 words

Examine the role of multi-modal cargo terminals in operationalizing the PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan.

In this answer
  1. How GCTs operationalize the Plan
  2. Limits of a terminal-led approach

The PM Gati Shakti National Master Plan (2021) seeks integrated, multi-modal connectivity across rail, road, ports and airports. Gati Shakti Cargo Terminals (GCTs), notified by the Ministry of Railways in December 2021 [2], are the freight-side instrument that converts this planning vision into physical loading capacity — though their reach stops well short of the Plan's full demand.

How GCTs operationalize the Plan

  • Multi-modal integration at the first and last mile: GCTs are rail terminals designed for transfer with road transport, directly executing the NMP's multi-modality principle; 124 terminals now carry an estimated traffic potential of ~200 million tonnes and revenue potential of ~₹20,000 crore annually [1].
  • Private capital, public network: developed by private/PSU/state agencies on railway or private land, they shift terminal capex off Railways' books — the first GCT, Maithan Power's siding at Thaparnagar (Asansol Division), shifted coal from road to about 120 rakes monthly [2].
  • Sectoral diversification: India's largest automobile GCT at Maruti Suzuki, Manesar [4] shows non-bulk cargo being pulled to rail, supporting the National Rail Plan target of raising rail's freight modal share from 27% to 45% by 2030 [3].
  • Demonstrated traction: GCT freight revenue rose over fourfold in three years to ₹12,608 crore in 2024-25 [6].

Limits of a terminal-led approach

  • Line capacity, not terminals, binds: average freight speed was 23.8 km/h on the conventional network against 37 km/h on DFCs, as passenger trains get priority [5].
  • Tariff remains untouched: freight yields ~65% of earnings and cross-subsidises passengers; the Standing Committee (2025) sought annual freight-rate review and dynamic pricing [5].
  • Narrow commodity base: coal alone is ~50% of freight earnings, with growth decelerating [5].
  • Outcome data absent: the 200 mt figure is potential, not audited throughput [1].

GCTs are thus a necessary but partial instrument — they create access points that the Master Plan needs, yet capacity and pricing decide whether cargo actually shifts. Pairing terminal expansion with section-wise capacity augmentation, yard modernisation, tariff rationalisation and published utilisation data would let GCTs deliver the seamless, cost-competitive logistics network the Plan envisages.

Sources

  1. 1Gati Shakti Multi-Modal Cargo Terminals (GCTs): Driving India's Logistics Transformation, PIB124 GCTs developed; ~200 mt traffic and ~₹20,000 crore revenue potential
  2. 2Indian Railways' 1st Gati Shakti Cargo Terminal commissioned in Asansol Division of Eastern Railway, PIBGCT Policy notified December 2021; Thaparnagar siding, ~120 inward coal rakes per month
  3. 3National Rail Plan aims to increase share of freight traffic from current percentage of 27 to 45 by 2030, PIBmodal-share target
  4. 4Union Railway Minister Inaugurates India's Largest Automobile Gati Shakti Multi-Modal Cargo Terminal at Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., Manesar, PIBsectoral, non-bulk terminal model
  5. 5Report Summary: Increasing Freight-related Earnings of Indian Railways and Development of Dedicated Freight Corridors, Standing Committee on Railways (16 December 2025), PRS Legislative Research23.8 km/h freight speed vs 37 km/h on DFC; freight ~65% of earnings and cross-subsidy; coal ~50% of freight earnings; dynamic pricing and yard modernisation recommendations
  6. 6Gati Shakti Multi-Modal Cargo Terminal Freight Revenue Increases Four Times in Three Years, Reaching ₹12,608.05 Cr in 2024-25, PIBGCT freight revenue growth

More from this note