·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 words

Examine the safeguards needed to make sure that population enumeration does not become a tool for surveillance or exclusion. How does the Census differ from the NPR and the NRC?

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Safeguards needed
  2. Census vs NPR vs NRC

Census 2027, India's first digital census, will deploy over 30 lakh enumerators and field officials [1]. Recent amendments to the Census Rules now let States/UTs appoint "any person they consider suitable" as enumerators. This has revived fears that the exercise could become an instrument of "surveillance, citizenship determination or electoral exclusion" [2]. Strong safeguards are therefore essential.

Safeguards needed

  • Legal firewall: Section 15 of the Census Act, 1948 bars anyone from inspecting census records and makes them inadmissible as evidence. Disclosure by census staff is an offence [3]. This protection must expressly cover the digital database and block data-sharing with other agencies.
  • Neutral enumerators: Publish eligibility criteria for the residual clause, such as barring party office-bearers [2]. Prefer staff who are bound by service conduct rules, such as those of banks and PSUs [2].
  • Accountability trail: Register every enumerator on the CMMS portal, since only registered staff can use the census app [1]. Serve written notice of secrecy duties before field work begins.
  • Data protection: Apply the Puttaswamy (2017) tests of legality, necessity and proportionality. Ensure purpose-limitation and encryption on the self-enumeration portal [4].
  • Parliamentary oversight: The Committee on Subordinate Legislation should check whether the amended Rules are consistent with the confidentiality on which mandatory, truthful answering rests [5].
  • Trust-building: The RGI should publish the State-wise share of non-government enumerators. Outreach should target migrants and minorities, who face the highest risk of undercount after the SIR controversy [2].

Census vs NPR vs NRC

Basis Census NPR NRC
Law Census Act, 1948 [3] Citizenship Act, 1955; Citizenship Rules, 2003 [6] Sec. 14A, Citizenship Act; Rules, 2003 [6]
Coverage Every person, regardless of citizenship Usual residents Citizens only
Purpose Aggregate demographic and socio-economic data Identity register of residents Verified list of citizens
Individual data Confidential; not evidence [3] Identity details retained Decides citizenship status
Consequence Statistical only Rules provide for verification towards NRC [6] Exclusion possible (e.g. Assam)

The Census remains credible only as long as it is a statistical exercise, not an adjudicatory one. Clear criteria for enumerators, strict confidentiality and legislative scrutiny can keep it apart from the NPR and the NRC. That separation protects the privacy guaranteed under Article 21 and keeps the data reliable for delimitation, resource devolution and the SDG pledge to "leave no one behind".

Sources

  1. 1PIB: Census 2027: World's largest census exercise begins with Houselisting and Housing Census (HLO): 30 lakh+ field functionaries; CMMS registration for app use
  2. 2The Hindu: CPI(M) flags concern over Census Rules in a letter to President (21 Oct 2026): "any person they consider suitable" clause; new enumerator categories; surveillance/exclusion and SIR concerns
  3. 3The Census Act, 1948 (as amended in 1994), India Code_doc.pdf): Section 15 confidentiality, records inadmissible as evidence, penalties for disclosure
  4. 4PIB: For the First Time, Census 2027 to Enable Digital Data Collection and Self-Enumeration: digital collection and self-enumeration portal
  5. 5PRS Legislative Research: India commences Census 2011: duty to answer truthfully paired with confidentiality of responses
  6. 6The Citizenship Act, 1955 and Citizenship (Registration of Citizens and Issue of National Identity Cards) Rules, 2003, India Code: Section 14A; legal basis of NPR and NRC

More from this note