·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityIR

Examine the significance and limitations of photo identity verification in ensuring free and fair elections in India.

In this answer
  1. Significance
  2. Limitations

Photo identity verification — the Electors Photo Identity Card (EPIC) plus a list of specified alternative documents — is the last-mile safeguard that matches the person at the booth with the name on the roll, operationalising the Election Commission's Article 324 mandate of "superintendence, direction and control" over elections [4].

Significance

  • Curbs impersonation: production of EPIC, or one of the specified photo documents, is made essential for casting a vote, closing the commonest avenue of bogus voting [2].
  • Inclusivity without dilution: the ECI's notification of 7 October 2025 permits electors to display any one of 12 alternative photo IDs — Aadhaar, MGNREGA job card, Ayushman Bharat/health smart card, UDID card, service or MP/MLA identity cards — so absence of EPIC alone does not disenfranchise [1].
  • Uniformity: a single central Commission prescribes one nationwide standard, unlike systems where identity rules vary by sub-national unit [4].
  • Auditability: booth-level verification creates a documented trail supporting post-poll scrutiny and public trust [2].

Limitations

  • Identity is not eligibility: a photo ID proves who a person is, not whether they are a citizen or ordinarily resident. Hence the ECI's Special Intensive Revision (SIR), launched under Article 324 and Section 21, RP Act 1950, to verify entries at the roll stage itself [3].
  • Roll-side defects persist: identical EPIC numbers were allotted across States under the pre-ERONET manual system; the ECI is now moving to unique EPIC numbers via ERONET 2.0 [5].
  • Delivery gaps: verification fails where the card never arrives, prompting the ECI to fast-track EPIC delivery within a fixed timeline [6].
  • Narrow reach: it cannot touch wrongful deletions, migrant and homeless voters lacking any listed document, or money power and misinformation.

Photo verification is therefore necessary but not sufficient: it secures the booth, while roll purity secures the franchise. Pairing a unique, digitally issued EPIC with transparent, appeal-backed roll revision and doorstep enrolment of migrants would let identity verification serve inclusion as much as integrity — realising the constitutional promise of universal adult suffrage under Article 326.

Sources

  1. 1Electors on the Voter List can display any one of 12 alternative Photo ID apart from EPIC to vote — PIB/ECI, 7 October 2025the 12 alternative photo identity documents and their inclusive intent
  2. 2EPIC or One of the Eleven Specified Photo Identity Documents Essential for Casting Vote — PIB/ECImandatory photo ID at the polling booth; anti-impersonation rationale
  3. 3ECI to begin Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Rolls in Bihar — PIB/ECISIR under Article 324 and Section 21, RP Act 1950; inclusion of eligible citizens and exclusion of ineligible entries
  4. 4About Election Commission of India — Election Commission of IndiaArticle 324 powers of superintendence, direction and control over rolls and elections
  5. 5EC clarifies that duplication in EPIC number does not imply duplicate/fake voters — PIB/ECIidentical EPIC series from the pre-ERONET manual process; move to unique EPIC numbers via ERONET 2.0
  6. 6ECI to fast-track EPIC delivery — PIB/ECItime-bound delivery of EPIC to electors
Practice
12 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity