Financial autonomy is the weakest link of the 74th Constitutional Amendment. Discuss with reference to municipal own-source revenues.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
The 74th Amendment (1992) made Urban Local Bodies (ULBs) a constitutional "third tier" and listed 18 functions for them in the Twelfth Schedule. It left their finances to state discretion. CAG audits across 18 states found that, on average, only about 32% of ULB revenue is their own [3]. Of the three Fs (functions, functionaries and funds), funds are the weakest.
Why own-source revenues remain weak
- Taxing power comes from the state: Under Art. 243X, municipalities can levy only the taxes that state law allows. Rates, revisions and exemptions usually stay with the state.
- Narrow, under-used base: Property tax is the main municipal tax, yet it yielded only 0.09% of GDP in 2017-18. RBI attributes this to undervaluation, incomplete registers, weak policy and ineffective administration [1].
- Capacity gaps: ULBs have an average staff vacancy of 37% [3], which weakens assessment, billing and recovery.
Consequences for autonomy
- Grant dependence: Revenues are concentrated in property tax and transfers from higher tiers, which RBI describes as a "lack of financial autonomy" [2].
- Resource gap: ULBs face a 42% gap between their resources and expenditure, and only 29% of spending goes to development work [3].
- Devolution on paper only: Of 17 functions devolved by law, only 4 are exercised with complete autonomy [3].
- Low creditworthiness: Corporations rely on bank loans and government support rather than municipal bonds, and capital spending stays minimal [2].
A qualified picture
- Large municipal corporations generate a majority of their revenue receipts themselves (64.5% in 2017-18) [1]. The weakness is sharpest in smaller ULBs.
- The 15th Finance Commission linked ULB grants to state-notified floor rates for property tax and better collection [4]. This was a push towards results, not just systems.
Way forward
- Let ULBs set rates within a band set by the state, with valuations revised on a fixed cycle.
- Widen coverage with GIS/geo-coding and support capacity building in smaller municipalities [1].
- Fill revenue posts so that tax-collection capacity improves [3].
- Strengthen State Finance Commissions (Art. 243Y) and develop a municipal bond market [1].
Functions and functionaries matter too, but without assured own revenue, ULBs cannot become genuine self-governments. Fiscal empowerment through property tax reform, predictable transfers and access to markets would fulfil the Amendment's promise of democratic decentralisation and advance SDG 11 (sustainable cities).
Sources
- 1RBI, Report on Municipal Finances (Nov 2022): chapter on property taxproperty tax at 0.09% of GDP; causes of low collection; own revenue at 64.5% of corporations' revenue receipts; recommendations on coverage, technology, capacity building and municipal bonds
- 2RBI Press Release, Report on Municipal Finances (2022)dependence on property tax and transfers, "lack of financial autonomy", reliance on bank loans, minimal capital spending
- 3CAG, Compendium of Performance Audits on Implementation of the 74th Constitutional Amendment Act32% own revenue, 42% resource gap, 37% staff vacancy, 4 of 17 functions fully devolved, need to build tax-collection capacity
- 4PRS Legislative Research, Report of the 15th Finance Commission for 2021-26 (summary)ULB grants conditional on floor rates for property tax and better collection