·The Hindu·15 marks·250–350 wordsEconomyIR

Geo-economic fragmentation hurts developing economies and LDCs disproportionately. Discuss, and suggest a reform agenda for the WTO.

In this answer
  1. Why the weaker economies lose more
  2. The other side
  3. Reform agenda for the WTO

Geo-economic fragmentation means world trade splitting into geopolitical blocs and overlapping FTAs. It erodes the rules-based system that weaker economies depend on most. The WTO's World Trade Report (WTR) 2026 projects that if FTAs replace the WTO, global GDP could be 6.9% lower by 2050 than otherwise [1].

Why the weaker economies lose more

  • Unequal losses: In this "FTA world", LDCs could lose 16.5% of GDP, more than three times the loss for high-income economies [2].
  • Fragile base: LDCs hold under 1% of world trade and face trade costs about 50% higher than rich economies [1]. They cannot absorb more costs.
  • Losing the MFN shield: About 72% of goods trade still moves at MFN tariffs [1]. Outside the blocs, small economies lose equal-treatment access and must bargain alone from a weak position.
  • Diversion and uncertainty: India's Department of Economic Affairs warns that such deals bring "greater trade diversion, higher trade costs, and greater uncertainty" [4].
  • No enforcement: The Appellate Body has not functioned since December 2019 [1]. Small members have no binding appeal against powerful partners.

The other side

  • Low- and middle-income economies have nearly doubled their share of world trade since 1995, to 45% [1]. Large developing economies like India can hedge through a diversified FTA strategy [4]. So the heaviest burden falls on LDCs, not on all developing countries equally.

Reform agenda for the WTO

  • Restore dispute settlement: Bring back a binding two-tier system. Meanwhile, build on mutually agreed solutions, which nearly tripled after 2019 [1].
  • Transparency: Only 59% of members filed subsidy notifications in 2015–24 [1]. Link technical assistance to timely reporting.
  • Need-based S&DT: Keep special treatment for LDCs, but tie flexibilities for larger economies to their actual trade capacity.
  • Update tariff commitments: Revisit Uruguay Round-era bindings to reflect today's economic weight [1].
  • FTAs as building blocks: Apply stricter GATT Article XXIV review so FTAs add to MFN instead of replacing it.
  • New-age rules: Agree plurilateral rules on digital trade, with easy entry for LDCs.

Fragmentation turns trade into a contest of bargaining power that LDCs cannot win. The WTR offers no reform blueprint [3], so members must write one. Reform pays: stronger cooperation could raise global GDP by 2.9% [1]. India, as a voice of the Global South, can lead this agenda and advance SDG 17.10's call for a universal, rules-based, non-discriminatory trading system.

Sources

  1. 1WTO – World Trade Report 2026: Executive Summaryscenario figures (−6.9% GDP, +2.9% under cooperation), 72% MFN trade, LDC <1% share and 50% higher trade costs, 45% share of low/middle-income economies, Appellate Body since 2019, rise in mutually agreed solutions, 59% subsidy notification rate, Uruguay Round tariff bindings
  2. 2WTO – World Trade Report 2026: Executive Summary (PDF)LDCs could lose 16.5% of GDP, more than three times the high-income loss
  3. 3WTO News – World Trade Report 2026 launch, 15 Sep 2026report does not prescribe a blueprint for WTO reform
  4. 4The Hindu – "Anti-multilateral trade deals may hit growth, exports: govt. economists" (2 Oct 2026)DEA Monthly Economic Review warning; India's diversified trade strategy within the WTO-centred system
Practice
7 questions on this article
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Economy