"Having rationalised rates, the next frontier of GST reform lies in process simplification." Discuss with reference to recent proposals for small taxpayers.
New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →In this answer
The September 2025 "GST 2.0" reform cut the main rate slabs to two (5% and 18%) and added a 40% demerit rate. In October 2026, the Centre is putting a five-pronged plan before the GST Council. The plan leaves rates alone and focuses on process, compliance and ease of doing business [1]. This shows that most of GST's remaining problems now lie in procedure, not in rates.
Why process is the next frontier
- Unfinished design: GST was built on 100% invoice matching. Two years after roll-out, CAG found that this matching "had not kicked in" [2].
- Weak follow-up: CAG's 2024 audit looked at 8,220 data mismatches. 15% of them were clear compliance failures, worth ₹2,203.57 crore [3]. The system flags problems, but officers do not act on them fast enough.
- Fixed compliance costs hurt small firms the most. A tax rate takes the same share from every firm, but the cost of filing and paperwork does not shrink with firm size.
Recent proposals for small taxpayers [1]
- Annual returns instead of monthly for small suppliers who sell only to consumers (B2C). This has been sent to States as a concept note.
- Automatic invoice matching between buyer and seller, plus less ITC paperwork. This would free up working capital that is now stuck in blocked credit.
- No multi-state registration for small sellers trading across India. This matters most for e-commerce.
- Treating services delivered through an overseas branch as exports, which they are not today. This would help service MSMEs.
Concerns
- Fraud risk: Since May 2023, officers have found 29,273 bogus firms with suspected fake ITC of ₹44,015 crore [4]. DGGI found more than 6,000 fake-ITC cases worth over ₹57,000 crore between 2020 and 2023 [5]. Fewer registrations and lighter ITC checks could make such fraud easier.
- States' view of revenue: With annual filing, States would learn about evasion much later. States hold two-thirds of Council votes, and after Mohit Minerals (2022) Council recommendations are only persuasive, so their concerns must be met.
Way forward
- Get the order right: allow credit only on matched invoices first, and cut paperwork after that.
- Fixed deadlines for officers to act on mismatches the system flags.
- Pilot annual filing at a low turnover limit first. Add stronger identity checks for the single registration.
- Amend the law on the export-of-services definition.
Rate rationalisation settled what taxpayers pay; process reform must now settle how they pay. If matching comes first and relief follows, these proposals can make GST a truly "Good and Simple Tax" without losing revenue. Building them through consensus in the Council under Article 279A would also strengthen cooperative federalism.
Sources
- 1"Centre to propose 5-pronged GST reform plan tomorrow", The Hindu, 7 Oct 2026 (news report)five prongs; no rate changes; annual B2C filing, invoice matching, ITC paperwork, single registration, overseas-branch export gap
- 2CAG Report No. 11 of 2019 – Compliance Audit, Department of Revenue (GST)invoice matching "not kicked in"
- 3CAG Audit Report No. 7 of 2024 (GST)15% of 8,220 mismatches were compliance failures; ₹2,203.57 crore
- 4PIB: 29,273 bogus firms involved in suspected ITC evasion of Rs. 44,015 crore detected since May 2023bogus-firm and fake-ITC figures
- 5PIB: DGGI detects more than 6,000 fake ITC cases involving over Rs. 57,000 crore, April 2020–September 2023DGGI fake-ITC figures