·PIB·15 marks·250–350 wordsPolityEconomy

High out-of-pocket expenditure remains the main barrier to Universal Health Coverage for diseases like cancer. Evaluate recent regulatory and fiscal measures to address it.

New · District CollectorCan you hold the district for 72 hours?Floods, a heatwave, an outbreak, a grievance queue. Take the decisions, see the consequences.Play →
In this answer
  1. Regulatory measures: gains
  2. Fiscal measures: gains
  3. Limitations

Cancer treatment pushes many Indian households into catastrophic out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE). A key driver is the supply-chain mark-up on drugs, which NPPA found averaged ~170% and reached 700%+ in some cases [1]. Recent measures have made real gains, but these remain incomplete.

Regulatory measures: gains

  • Trade Margin Rationalisation (TMR): In 2019, NPPA used Para 19, DPCO 2013 to cap margins at 30% on 42 non-scheduled cancer drugs. MRPs of 526 brands fell ~50% on average, saving patients ~₹984 crore a year [2].
  • 2026 extension: The 30% cap now covers all non-scheduled anti-cancer drugs: branded or generic, patented or imported. Prices are expected to fall up to 70%, saving ₹2,500 crore a year. Manufacturers must keep production at current levels [1].
  • Cooperative federalism: Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Karnataka pressed for the cap [1].

Fiscal measures: gains

  • Budget 2025-26: 36 life-saving drugs are fully exempt from Basic Customs Duty and 6 attract a concessional 5%. Drugs supplied under Patient Assistance Programmes are also exempt [3].
  • Day Care Cancer Centres will be set up in all district hospitals within three years (200 in 2025-26), cutting travel and indirect costs [4].

Limitations

  • Weak legal footing: DPCO allows margin capping only temporarily. The Standing Committee on Chemicals and Fertilisers urged amending DPCO [5]. In 2026 it again flagged the absence of a permanent TMR framework [6].
  • Enforcement gaps: Price-to-stockist data is not public, so patients cannot check margins [5]. Large overcharged amounts are stuck in litigation, and NPPA lacks hospital and rural sales data [6].
  • Design flaw: A flat 30% margin is largest in rupee terms on the costliest drugs. WHO advises regressive mark-ups instead (lower rates for higher-priced drugs) [7]. The manufacturer's price, the main cost of patented imports, remains free [1].
  • Availability risk: The supply condition binds only manufacturers. Chemists in small towns may stop stocking low-margin specialty drugs.

Overall, margin caps and duty relief have substantially reduced the price of cancer drugs. The way forward is to:

  • put TMR into DPCO through a statutory amendment;
  • disclose PTS data;
  • adopt a WHO-style regressive mark-up;
  • track drug availability in district markets.

Combined with decentralised care, these steps can turn lower prices into lower OOPE. That would bring India closer to SDG 3.8: universal health coverage with financial protection.

Sources

  1. 1PIB: Government Expands Cancer Medicine Price Controls; Cancer Patients Expected to Save ₹2,500 Crore Annually (Oct 2026)170%/700% mark-ups, 30% cap on all non-scheduled anti-cancer drugs, up to 70% price fall, ₹2,500 crore savings, production condition, State demands, manufacturer price uncontrolled
  2. 2PIB: NPPA has put a cap on Trade Margin of 42 select non-scheduled anti-cancer medicines under TMR ApproachPara 19 use, 526 brands, ~50% average cut, ₹984 crore savings
  3. 3PIB: Union Budget 2025-26 proposes to remove seven customs tariff rates for industrial goodsBCD exemption for 36 drugs, 5% on 6, Patient Assistance Programme exemptions
  4. 4PIB: Towards a Cancer-Free India (Feb 2025)Day Care Cancer Centres in all district hospitals, 200 in 2025-26
  5. 5PRS Legislative Research: Price Rise of Medicines in the Pharmaceutical Sector (Standing Committee report summary)TMR only temporary under DPCO, amendment recommended, PTS data not public
  6. 6PRS Legislative Research: Monthly Policy Review, August 2026no permanent TMR framework, unrecovered overcharging in litigation, NPPA data gaps
  7. 7WHO Guideline on Country Pharmaceutical Pricing Policies (2020)recommends regressive rather than fixed-percentage mark-ups
Practice
7 questions on this item
Check the answer for each question, or reveal all at once.
Practice MCQs →

More from this note

More on Polity